| Lurk all you'd like, but why not register and post some pics? Registering also makes it easier to find the good stuff. Need help? |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Shooters | Calendar | Reviews | Tutorials | Gallery | Books | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Major grins
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 429
|
Lets do the time warp
I have such difficulty taking these stage shots at a local theater. The lighting is always fairly dim and all over the color temp spectrum. I don’t really like using my strobe because I just end up with monster shadows, and when I use ambient light I have to kick the ISO up to at least 800. Also often times they use smoke, so when I use a strobe it just looks like crap with the smoke.
Any tips tricks or advice. Here is my most recent attempt. I am happy with a couple of them, but really want to improve. Dr Disecto ![]() Lets do the time warp again.... ![]() Tadda... ![]()
__________________
http://roadkill.smugmug.com/ Last edited by Roadkill; Nov-03-2009 at 06:54 AM. Reason: spelling |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Grinnin'
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 815
|
How fast a lens were you using? f/2 or better really makes a difference. Also, if ISO 800 is a problem, the best solution (though not inexpensive) is to get a better camera. With my old Rebel XSi, I wasn't comfortable going beyond ISO 400, but with a 5D Mark II, I can go to 1600 without worry, and push it to 3200 if absolutely necessary.
As I was just noting in another thread, last Friday I used an EF 35mm f/2 on my 5D2 at a dimly-lit Halloween party, mostly at ISO 3200. Looking at the shots, you'd think the room was lit by floodlights.
__________________
http://craigd.smugmug.com 35mm Digital SLR: Canon 5D Mark II 35mm Film SLR: Nikon F2, Nikon FE, Asahi Pentax SV 35mm Film Rangefinder: Konica III Medium Format Film SLR: Pentax 67 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Let the shootin' begin...
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,605
|
No C&C here, but I think they are good. I especially like the last one.
__________________
Randy |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Major grins
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 429
|
I'm using a Nikon D200 with a 3.5 18-200 VR
As much as I would like a markII type camera, It is out of the question for me right now. Rwells... Thank you
__________________
http://roadkill.smugmug.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Major grins
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,565
|
Hi Roadkill.......I like the set .... I'm like Randy, I like #4 the best.... I find the first one to be a little soft, and may have a little color cast to it..... I think with a little PP the first one could be as sharp, and have the pop the last one has.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Grinnin'
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 815
|
Quote:
If you're going to stick with the D200 for the time being, and not use a flash, then you need faster lenses. Basically, you can either get faster zooms (probably at least two of them, since nobody that I know of makes a fast 18-200mm zoom), or buy even faster primes in the most useful focal lengths for what you're shooting. For the zooms, stick to f/2.8. For primes, get f/2 or better. An f/2.8 zoom isn't cheap, so if that's beyond your budget at the moment, a couple of inexpensive primes may be the best solution. I see that Nikon has 35mm and 85mm f/1.8 lenses that are each less than $400. They seem to get good reviews. You also mentioned difficulties with color temperature. I think the best solution to that is to shoot RAW and do your own white-balancing on the computer.
__________________
http://craigd.smugmug.com 35mm Digital SLR: Canon 5D Mark II 35mm Film SLR: Nikon F2, Nikon FE, Asahi Pentax SV 35mm Film Rangefinder: Konica III Medium Format Film SLR: Pentax 67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Major grins
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,060
|
I liked them all -- really curious about the play
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
www.aspenroadimages.com
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 33
|
I think you'd do yourself a huge favor ramping up your ISO to 800 and hitting up borrowlenses.com for a faster prime lens, or two. I also shoot with a d200 and had issues last Christmas shooting some family pics in our living room which had awful lighting and was using the 18-200 f3.5/5.6 lens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Shutter Never Sleeps
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: TR,NJ
Posts: 501
|
Its a nice set....
Try a 50 1.8 cheap and good
__________________
Ted It's not what you look at that matters: Its what you see! Nikon D90, D50, 50 f1.8, 85 f1.8D, AFS 24-85 f3.5-4.5, 70-300 VR Tamron 70-200 f2.8, 28-75 f2.8 macro, 18-200 f3.5-6.3, Tokina 12-24 My Pictures can be seen at http://www.time2smile.smugmug.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Major grins
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 429
|
Thank you for all the tips and advice, guess it's going to come down to equipment.
Quote:
borrowlenses.com what an interesting site.
__________________
http://roadkill.smugmug.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Major grins
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,565
|
This is what I think........ If you like it, then I will go through the steps.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Major grins
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 429
|
Quote:
__________________
http://roadkill.smugmug.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Major grins
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,565
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tell The World! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|