Lurk all you'd like, but why not register and post some pics? Registering also makes it easier to find the good stuff. Need help?

Go Back   Digital Grin Photography Forum > Shots > Other Cool Shots
Dgrinner
Password
Register FAQ Shooters Calendar Reviews Tutorials Gallery Books Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Nov-03-2009, 06:54 AM   #1
Roadkill
Major grins
 
Roadkill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 429
Lets do the time warp

I have such difficulty taking these stage shots at a local theater. The lighting is always fairly dim and all over the color temp spectrum. I don’t really like using my strobe because I just end up with monster shadows, and when I use ambient light I have to kick the ISO up to at least 800. Also often times they use smoke, so when I use a strobe it just looks like crap with the smoke.


Any tips tricks or advice.


Here is my most recent attempt. I am happy with a couple of them, but really want to improve.



Dr Disecto





Lets do the time warp again....





Tadda...




__________________
http://roadkill.smugmug.com/

Last edited by Roadkill; Nov-03-2009 at 06:54 AM. Reason: spelling
Roadkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-03-2009, 07:31 AM   #2
craig_d
Grinnin'
 
craig_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 815
How fast a lens were you using? f/2 or better really makes a difference. Also, if ISO 800 is a problem, the best solution (though not inexpensive) is to get a better camera. With my old Rebel XSi, I wasn't comfortable going beyond ISO 400, but with a 5D Mark II, I can go to 1600 without worry, and push it to 3200 if absolutely necessary.

As I was just noting in another thread, last Friday I used an EF 35mm f/2 on my 5D2 at a dimly-lit Halloween party, mostly at ISO 3200. Looking at the shots, you'd think the room was lit by floodlights.
__________________
http://craigd.smugmug.com
35mm Digital SLR: Canon 5D Mark II
35mm Film SLR: Nikon F2, Nikon FE, Asahi Pentax SV
35mm Film Rangefinder: Konica III
Medium Format Film SLR: Pentax 67
craig_d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-03-2009, 08:07 AM   #3
rwells
Let the shootin' begin...
 
rwells's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,605
No C&C here, but I think they are good. I especially like the last one.
__________________
Randy
rwells is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-03-2009, 11:09 AM   #4
Roadkill
Major grins
 
Roadkill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 429
I'm using a Nikon D200 with a 3.5 18-200 VR

As much as I would like a markII type camera, It is out of the question for me right now.



Rwells... Thank you
__________________
http://roadkill.smugmug.com/
Roadkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-03-2009, 11:50 AM   #5
Azzaro
Major grins
 
Azzaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,565
Hi Roadkill.......I like the set .... I'm like Randy, I like #4 the best.... I find the first one to be a little soft, and may have a little color cast to it..... I think with a little PP the first one could be as sharp, and have the pop the last one has....... Why don't you rent a lens with fast glass for a night, and see if that helps you get the shots easier ....... azzaro
Azzaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-03-2009, 11:51 AM   #6
craig_d
Grinnin'
 
craig_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadkill
I'm using a Nikon D200 with a 3.5 18-200 VR
I don't know that much about Nikon lenses (being a Canon shooter myself), but from a quick search online, the only Nikkor 18-200 VR that I saw was f/3.5-5.6, which I would not consider an acceptable low-light lens -- even f/3.5 at the short end is a bit too slow, to say nothing of the f/5.6 at the long end.

If you're going to stick with the D200 for the time being, and not use a flash, then you need faster lenses. Basically, you can either get faster zooms (probably at least two of them, since nobody that I know of makes a fast 18-200mm zoom), or buy even faster primes in the most useful focal lengths for what you're shooting. For the zooms, stick to f/2.8. For primes, get f/2 or better. An f/2.8 zoom isn't cheap, so if that's beyond your budget at the moment, a couple of inexpensive primes may be the best solution. I see that Nikon has 35mm and 85mm f/1.8 lenses that are each less than $400. They seem to get good reviews.

You also mentioned difficulties with color temperature. I think the best solution to that is to shoot RAW and do your own white-balancing on the computer.
__________________
http://craigd.smugmug.com
35mm Digital SLR: Canon 5D Mark II
35mm Film SLR: Nikon F2, Nikon FE, Asahi Pentax SV
35mm Film Rangefinder: Konica III
Medium Format Film SLR: Pentax 67
craig_d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-03-2009, 06:15 PM   #7
Dogdots
Major grins
 
Dogdots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,060
I liked them all -- really curious about the play
__________________
Mary
www.Dogdotsphotography.com
Dogdots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-04-2009, 06:55 PM   #8
tpodonne
www.aspenroadimages.com
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 33
I think you'd do yourself a huge favor ramping up your ISO to 800 and hitting up borrowlenses.com for a faster prime lens, or two. I also shoot with a d200 and had issues last Christmas shooting some family pics in our living room which had awful lighting and was using the 18-200 f3.5/5.6 lens.
tpodonne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-04-2009, 09:16 PM   #9
time2smile
Shutter Never Sleeps
 
time2smile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: TR,NJ
Posts: 501
Its a nice set....

Try a 50 1.8 cheap and good
__________________
Ted


It's not what you look at that matters: Its what you see!
Nikon D90, D50, 50 f1.8, 85 f1.8D, AFS 24-85 f3.5-4.5, 70-300 VR
Tamron 70-200 f2.8, 28-75 f2.8 macro, 18-200 f3.5-6.3, Tokina 12-24

My Pictures can be seen at http://www.time2smile.smugmug.com
time2smile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-05-2009, 03:40 AM   #10
Roadkill
Major grins
 
Roadkill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 429
Thank you for all the tips and advice, guess it's going to come down to equipment.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Azzaro
I think with a little PP the first one could be as sharp
What kind of PP could be done to help this image?



borrowlenses.com what an interesting site.
__________________
http://roadkill.smugmug.com/
Roadkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-05-2009, 04:44 AM   #11
Azzaro
Major grins
 
Azzaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,565
This is what I think........ If you like it, then I will go through the steps.....

Azzaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-05-2009, 07:44 AM   #12
Roadkill
Major grins
 
Roadkill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azzaro
This is what I think........ If you like it, then I will go through the steps.....
Deffinetly made it look sharper, what did you do to it.. Thank you..
__________________
http://roadkill.smugmug.com/
Roadkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov-05-2009, 03:30 PM   #13
Azzaro
Major grins
 
Azzaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadkill
Deffinetly made it look sharper, what did you do to it.. Thank you..
I use Nikon Capture NX2........I used black point and white point and a High Pass.....and some minor adjustments..... What program do you use for pp? If you want a little more explanation....Drop me and e-mail......azzaro
Azzaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tell The World!

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -8.   It's 09:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.