|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|
|
Waiting for the light...
|
Starscape
30 seconds, f/7.1 ISO 6400
D4 with 14-24mm at 16mm Trees lit from distant street light.
__________________
Cheers, Monte |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|
|
artistically challenged
|
That's really nice, Monte. What makes the trees orange? Is it the tungsten light from the street lamp? It looks like fall colors, but way too consistent. Color balance in the sky is just right. Those straggly disconnected parts of trees midway up on both sides are kinda bugging me, so I'd clone 'em out. But that's pretty subjective.
|
|
|
|
|
#3
|
||
|
Waiting for the light...
|
Quote:
The color on the trees will have to be called artistic license I suppose. I did not like the green trees so I simply changed the white balance. Too much?
__________________
Cheers, Monte |
|
|
|
||
|
#4
|
|
|
artistically challenged
|
I dunno, man. Looks pretty cool to me. But you're going to be forever explaining to people what makes the trees orange.
|
|
|
|
|
#5
|
|
|
Major grins
|
[QUOTE=Montec;1814316]30 seconds, f/7.1 ISO 6400
D4 with 14-24mm at 16mm Trees lit from distant street light. Wow! This is nice. I agree with Kdog regarding the cloning too, and the color of the trees is cool, but overpower the sky. Your subject to begin with I think. My two cents. I really like this.
__________________
http://lamiller.smugmug.com |
|
|
|
|
#6
|
|
|
Drive By Digital Shooter
|
Mmmmm...... Milky way!
Complementary colors ( orange and blue ) almost always make for nice photos. This shot works for me!! Why not f4 at ISO 1600, rather than 6400?? Just curious.
__________________
Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin |
|
|
|
|
#7
|
|
|
Waiting for the light...
|
Because the super high ISO brings out the stars like nothing else.
__________________
Cheers, Monte |
|
|
|
|
#8
|
|
|
Major grins
|
Nicely done.
I think I'd crop the sides off instead of cloning. That would also get rid of some of the streakiest stars. Have you considered stacking 6 five second exposures instead of 1 thirty second exposure? I know the calculators say you can go that long on wide angle lenses, but you do get different effects in the edges than the center. |
|
|
|
|
#9
|
|
|
Waiting for the light...
|
I will share another from this evening.
Anyone STILL believe we are the only ones out there??
__________________
Cheers, Monte |
|
|
|
|
#10
|
|
|
artistically challenged
|
Doesn't seem possible, does it?
|
|
|
|
|
#11
|
|
|
Major grins
|
Can you please share the exif data of the second one?
__________________
Smugmug: http://tanveer.smugmug.com FB:https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography Site :http://www.tanveer.in Blog :http://tsk1979.livejournal.com |
|
|
|
|
#12
|
|
|
Waiting for the light...
|
30 seconds
F/2.8 ISO 3200 Nikon 14-24 at 15mm Manual focus set at infinity
__________________
Cheers, Monte |
|
|
|
| Tell The World! | |
| Similar Threads | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | ![]() |
| Starscape self portrait | Isaac Dwyer | Other Cool Shots | 5 | Aug-30-2012 12:30 PM | |
| Starscape | CanonFan | Other Cool Shots | 0 | Aug-16-2011 05:07 PM | |
| Lunar starscape | schmoo | Landscapes | 16 | Jul-07-2009 08:08 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|