|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|
|
Major grins
|
Lens suggestions? (I'm sure it's been covered!)
But I'll be danged if I can do a search and find what I'm looking for! "Suggestions" and "Lens" seems to be in about 70% of the posts when I search.
![]() So, any suggestions on a lens geared toward "people" photography? ([FONT=Verdana][FONT="][/FONT][/FONT]I'm going to have a new "subject" to focus on in slightly less than 9 months!) ![]() Right now I have a 10-22mm which seems to give our doggies big heads when I get fairly close, and the box 18-55 that came with my 20d. I'd like to get something sharper like the 10-22, but without the big headedness. Any suggestions or pointers on where to look would be appreciated!! Thanks Much, Eric |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
||
|
Major grins
|
Quote:
__________________
--Travis |
|
|
|
||
|
#3
|
||
|
Major grins
|
Quote:
The shots in this thread : http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=82591 were taken with it.
__________________
Heather www.heatherdunnphotography.com My Blog My Facebook Page GIVING BACK - How will you give? "I look at life outside of the lens and capture the world through it." -Thomas Robinson
|
|
|
|
||
|
#4
|
|
|
Major grins
|
Spend 70$ first
And get yourself the 50mm 1.8
On APS-C bodies like the 20D its a must have lens for potraints, even dog potraits The lens is not that sharp at 1.8(but still pretty sharp), and is simply amazing around F4 A Few samples for you ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Smugmug: http://tanveer.smugmug.com FB:https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography Site :http://www.tanveer.in Blog :http://tsk1979.livejournal.com |
|
|
|
|
#5
|
|
|
Grinning...and bearing it
|
You didn't say what your budget is?
The 50mm F1.8 runs $70-ish, and is amazing for the price , but can be cantakerous at times. At $300 the 50mm F1.4 would be a great choice. For a bit more than that a Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 ($350). Above that, the sky is the limit. I recently added the Canon17-55 F2.8IS to my bag and it is a pleasure to use. It ran $930 with a hood and shipping. Of these I own the 50mmF1.8, The Tamron 28-75 F2.8, and the Canon 17-55 F2.8IS. I also use a Canon 85..F1.8, but it is quite long for indoor use. If it were me, The 17-55IS would be the one. It is perfectly suited for an 1.6x sensor and the stabilization plus outstanding image quality...and fast aperature make it a winner. Good luck, and congradulations!!! 1. Taken with Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 ![]() 2.Another with the Tamron. It is a close focuser and will allow some very nice up close and personal shots. ![]() 3.50mm F1.8 ![]() 4. Canon 50mm F1.8 ![]() 5. The rest taken with Canon 17-55 F2.8IS ![]() ![]()
__________________
Thanks, Jeff -Need help with Dgrin?; Wedding Photography Resources -My Website - Blog - Tips for Senior Portraiture |
|
|
|
|
#6
|
||
|
"Hit em hard"
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
||
|
#7
|
|
|
Major grins
|
For portraits, I prefer primes, assuming that you can foot zoom a touch.
For maybe half body to headshots, a Sigma 30mm f1.4 would be nice. If you are more toward a head and shoulder to head shot, maybe a 50mm f1.8 or a 50mm f1.4, depending on your budget and how often you intend to use it. If you are looking at more of a tight headshot, maybe a 85mm f1.8. Good luck.
__________________
My Gallery |
|
|
|
|
#8
|
|
|
Have PASSPORT will TRAVEL
|
I will 2nd the opinon of the 24-70 f2.8 or the newer 17-70 f2.8 for the close in shots if your wanting to stay back a ways...then the 70-200 f2.8.....all tack sharp and I forgot to mention all SIGMA so aliitle easier on the pocket book than canon lenses.....I have shot with sigma well over 20 yrs..........Good Luck
__________________
"Genuine Fractals was, is and will always be the best solution for enlarging digital photos." ....Vincent Versace ... ... COPYRIGHT YOUR WORK ONLINE ... ... My Website A ZENFOLIO 10% Discount Coupon CODE - A8K-Q2K-VPG |
|
|
|
| Tell The World! | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|