So this is 4 1/2 inches?

Comments

• Options

  thoth Registered Users Posts: 1,085 Major grins

  December 24, 2009 edited December 24, 2009

  This is one of those times that titling hurts the image. I don't get it.
  
  Overall, the image is a bit flat in both contrast and content. With no foreground/background elements to guide my eye, I'm left to wander around a bit. I think a less oblique angle on the subjects would have given more structure to the overall photo.
  
  The shot could also benefit from setting black and white points and a boost in contrast. If you have Photoshop, this tutorial is extremely easy to follow and will take your photos to a new level.

  Travis

  0
• Options

  rutt Registered Users Posts: 6,511 Major grins

  December 24, 2009 edited December 24, 2009

  A fish? A part of the human body? I couldn't figure it out either.

  If not now, when?

  0
• Options

  bdcolen Registered Users Posts: 3,804 Major grins

  December 24, 2009 edited December 24, 2009

  rutt wrote:

  A fish? A part of the human body? I couldn't figure it out either.

  
  I'm guessing it's a penis joke. It's pretty tasteless, but the image is good. I like the light.

  bd@bdcolenphoto.com

  ---

  "He not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan
  
  "The more ambiguous the photograph is, the better it is..." Leonard Freed

  0
• Options

  masterofone Registered Users Posts: 191 Major grins

  December 25, 2009 edited December 25, 2009

  It's pretty tasteless

  Sorry if I caused offense. Lesson learned.
  
  

  If you have Photoshop, this tutorial is extremely easy to follow and will take your photos to a new level.

  I do not have photoshop, so if I don't get it somewhat close when I shoot it, then I am out of luck.
  
  
  Thanks for having a look.

  Brian
  Have keyboard and opinion.
  
  Senska Photography

  0