Options
should i trade my D5000 for a D90?
babygodzilla
Registered Users Posts: 184 Major grins
Last year when I was shopping for my first DSLR, my friend suggested that I get the D5000. It was just about brand new and it doesn't cost that much.
The D5000 has been treating me very well so far, but now that I know a little bit more about cameras and want to be more creative, I wish I had spent the extra $200 and gotten the D90 instead. I'm itching for the built-in Commander that comes with it. Right now if I want to use off-camera flash, I have to bring my SB-900 and a borrowed SB-800, and it's just a lot of crap to bring around. I could use a sync cord, but that looks ugly not to mention limited by length of the cord. I could buy an SU-8, but that's another $500+ and yet another thing to lug around, although not as large as an SB-800.
If I had a body with built-in Commander then I could at least use one flash off-camera with ease. So now I'm in a dilemma. Should I trade in my D5000 for the older D90? I believe they use the same sensors, right? The D90 has a much better LCD resolution, but the D5000 has the swivel type, which I like a lot, and as far as I know only exists on the D5000.
What are the pros and cons here that you guys can see? I feel weird trading in for something older, although I shouldn't care about that but focus on the specs instead.
Another option is to go for the D300s, but that's $1000 more than my D5000 :cry
Would like to know your opinions. Thanks!
The D5000 has been treating me very well so far, but now that I know a little bit more about cameras and want to be more creative, I wish I had spent the extra $200 and gotten the D90 instead. I'm itching for the built-in Commander that comes with it. Right now if I want to use off-camera flash, I have to bring my SB-900 and a borrowed SB-800, and it's just a lot of crap to bring around. I could use a sync cord, but that looks ugly not to mention limited by length of the cord. I could buy an SU-8, but that's another $500+ and yet another thing to lug around, although not as large as an SB-800.
If I had a body with built-in Commander then I could at least use one flash off-camera with ease. So now I'm in a dilemma. Should I trade in my D5000 for the older D90? I believe they use the same sensors, right? The D90 has a much better LCD resolution, but the D5000 has the swivel type, which I like a lot, and as far as I know only exists on the D5000.
What are the pros and cons here that you guys can see? I feel weird trading in for something older, although I shouldn't care about that but focus on the specs instead.
Another option is to go for the D300s, but that's $1000 more than my D5000 :cry
Would like to know your opinions. Thanks!
0
Comments
What about the D5000 is holding you back or what about the D90 and D300 bodies is interesting to you?
Will you need to use manual focus lenses?
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
1. Trade in for the older D90, but I'm reluctant to pay more for an older model.
2. Trade in for the D300s, and spend another $1000 (more or less).
3. Buy an SU-800, spend $500-600.
4. Buy a sync cord for $30, but limited by cord length and it looks ugly.
Not sure what you're asking in relation to the manual focus lens.
Thanks
Manual focus lenses will only meter on D300 and above bodies.
I would go for the 30 dollar cord, there will be a new model soon enough and for what you are asking you don't gain much for the upgrade now. Wait a bit and the upgrade will be a lot bigger than just the user interface, and a few features.
I believe the D90 will take manual focus Nikon "F" mount lenses and also has the AF screw drive to accommodate AF-D lenses, although I do not believe the manual focus lenses will meter on the D90, but I think it will confirm focus. The D300/D300S also will meter manual focus Nikon lenses, extending the usable lens base.
I understand some of the appeal of the Nikon wireless flash technology built into the cameras, but the truth is I rarely use wireless flash automation, preferring manual flash control and radio transmitter/slaves instead.
If the D90 meets your needs, and it seems that it does for the wireless flash automation, then it makes sense to purchase what should work for you. If you need a faster responsiveness, like for sports/action/rapid motion wildlife, then the D300 cameras might be a better choice.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
isn't that what the Nikon Creative Lighting System is? radio transmitter/slaves? it's just that Nikon flashes comes equipped with their own transmitter/receivers so that we don't have to buy a separate transmitter/receiver?
I don't have any manual focus lenses so I supposed this is not an issue for me.
besides the better LCD and the built-in commander, in what other areas are the D90 considered upgrades from the D5000?
Yeah I thought about this. Perhaps I'll hold off on buying anything for now. My D5000 is not even a year old. I can live with it for a while longer until a newer model comes out that hopefully is cheaper than the D300s. Hopefully. But we'll see, haven't dismissed the D90 yet just yet... Is there a page that gives an update on upcoming Nikon DSLRs? Can't find one on the Nikon page.
I haven't tried the D90 but neither the D70 or D80 would meter with manual Nikon lenses.
They have the same number of AF points but the D90 can work with lenses that don't have built in motors (but almost all do now) and the D90 has a bigger viewfinder, and front control dial. There are some other little things like the wireless flash control but overall I would not be going to a D90 from the D5000. The D300 offers you many new things like many more direct controls for camera functions, 51 point AF, much bigger viewfinder and better build quality among other things, but that is a big jump in price.
According to Ken Rockwell's Nikon lens compatibility page, the D90 will not meter with AI or AI-S lenses. You have to have a D200 or better.
Got bored with digital and went back to film.
Might want to get the DVDE set off amazon on the Nikon CLS system to get a great understanding of the system...............................
Here is a nice primer on the Nikon CLS and Advanced Wireless Lighting control:
http://www.nikondigital.org/articles/cls_vanhoose/index.htm
The following shows the actual pulses used to communicate between flashes in the preflash sequence of the CLS dialog:
http://dptnt.com/2009/12/nikon-cls-advanced-wireless-lighting-part-v/
Yes, Nikon CLS/AWL is a visible light based system and relies primarily on line-of-sight and bounced-light.
I'll bet you saw this comparison:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond5000/
The D5000 is fairly well featured compared to many of the specifications of the D90. The improved viewfinder of the D90 with better coverage, increased magnification and a pentaprism instead of a penta-mirror is a pretty good reason.
Responsiveness tests here:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D5000/D5000A6.HTM
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D90/D90A6.HTM
You should feel a boost in responsiveness in most categories from the D90. (I'm not sure why since they do seem to share many of the same components that should matter.)
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
You would need two transmitters if you want to shutter and flash at the same time. I thinnk the D5000 has a remote port, but please check first, either way you can still use it as a flash trigger.
It's not what you look at that matters: Its what you see!
Nikon
http://www.time2smile.smugmug.com
Do this.
And then go out and buy this:
http://strobist.blogspot.com/2008/05/now-available-strobist-lighting-dvds.html
thanks very much for your explanations!
Not sure where you got that info, but B&H has it for $249.
If the prime motivation is just to get the flash off camera, this would be a flexible/economic choice. (That is, assuming you need to maintain iTTL support)
http://www.arkreations.com
Nikon D700 | D300 | D80 | SB-800(x2) | SB-600(x2)
Nikkor Lenses: 14-24 f/2.8 | 24-70 f/2.8 | 50 f/1.8 | 85 f/1.4 | 70-200 f/2.8 VR II | 70-300 VR
oh sorry. perhaps i remembered the price wrong. but that's still a bit of money for me...
thanks
It's a lot of crap...but get used to it, if you want to be lighting up location scenes, or doing any number of creative things out of doors.
I totally understand the itch of CLS. I have used it like it was a religion on my Nikon stuff since day one...and it is useful. Lots of folks don't really care for it though, but there are plenty more like me that do enjoy it.
The fact is, CLS works quite well.
As for now. Why not op for a SB600? they are in supply and can be had for a reasonable price compared to other choices you've mentioned. So for example, you get one for under $200 (typically$165), and now you have a great commander in your SB900 AND an off camera flash. Use those until you decide you HAVE TO HAVE another camera. You won't have sacrificed anything in the learning curve, and will have been using CLS, etc, all the while building toward a different body...and that'll give you the time too for truly judging whatever it is you are missing in the other available bodies~
Cheers,
Is the AF in a sports / action environment that much better with a D300 /300S (compared to a D90)?
Olympus E3 w HLD4, E520, E510 11-22mm, 50-200mm,35mm macro, 14-42mm, 40-150, FL50R & FL36R
http://rokklym.smugmug.com/
We need sometimes to escape into open solitudes, into aimlessness, into the moral holiday of running some pure hazard, in order to sharpen the edge of life,to taste hardship, and to be compelled to work desperately for a moment no matter what.
- George Santayana, "The philosophy of travel"
With outdoor sports and in good light both camera AF systems are probably pretty similar. The difference will become more apparent as the light goes down. There is some empirical evidence to indicate that the D3 series are best of all Nikons to AF quickly and accurately in low light.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums