Options

Framing

ChiShutterChiShutter Registered Users Posts: 83 Big grins
edited March 9, 2010 in People
804101042_wC2rB-L.jpg

Comments

  • Options
    Mr. QuietMr. Quiet Registered Users Posts: 1,047 Major grins
    edited March 7, 2010
    Can't see anything...
    If you work at something hard enough, you WILL achieve your goal. "Me"

    D200
    NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4 D
    Tamron SP AF90mm f/2.8 Di 1:1


    Welcome to my NEW website!

    Mr. Christoferson
  • Options
    ChiShutterChiShutter Registered Users Posts: 83 Big grins
    edited March 8, 2010
    Mr. Quiet wrote:
    Can't see anything...
    Odd. It shows up in multiple browsers on multiple devices for me. Link seems to be good.
  • Options
    Mr. QuietMr. Quiet Registered Users Posts: 1,047 Major grins
    edited March 8, 2010
    Now I can see a very good picture. Good tittle too. You might want to add a bit more black in there.

    Great shotclap.gifclapclap.gif
    If you work at something hard enough, you WILL achieve your goal. "Me"

    D200
    NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4 D
    Tamron SP AF90mm f/2.8 Di 1:1


    Welcome to my NEW website!

    Mr. Christoferson
  • Options
    zoomerzoomer Registered Users Posts: 3,688 Major grins
    edited March 8, 2010
    Nice action photo. I like it, looks she is getting into it.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
    http://500px.com/Shockey
    alloutdoor.smugmug.com
    http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
  • Options
    ChiShutterChiShutter Registered Users Posts: 83 Big grins
    edited March 8, 2010
    Thanks guys. Was experimenting with a friend's loaned 70-200 2.8, and this is one of my favorites from my first day shooting with the telezoom.
  • Options
    CaspianCaspian Registered Users Posts: 165 Major grins
    edited March 8, 2010
    Which 70-200?
    Which 70-200 were you using? That range is on my short list of lenses to get. I shoot a Nikon camera, but I am considering the Sigma and Tamron 70-200 because the Nikon is incredibly expensive.
    David McPherson
    davidmcpherson.smugmug.com
  • Options
    Mr. QuietMr. Quiet Registered Users Posts: 1,047 Major grins
    edited March 8, 2010
    Caspian wrote:
    Which 70-200 were you using? That range is on my short list of lenses to get. I shoot a Nikon camera, but I am considering the Sigma and Tamron 70-200 because the Nikon is incredibly expensive.

    Nikon's 70-200 is a bit up there in price, but it will beat Tamron and Sigma at most anything. Speed, sharpness, and color rendering. I go the rout of primes, but that lens has made it onto my list to be the only zoom lens. If you get it, you will not regret it.
    If you work at something hard enough, you WILL achieve your goal. "Me"

    D200
    NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4 D
    Tamron SP AF90mm f/2.8 Di 1:1


    Welcome to my NEW website!

    Mr. Christoferson
  • Options
    ChiShutterChiShutter Registered Users Posts: 83 Big grins
    edited March 8, 2010
    Caspian wrote:
    Which 70-200 were you using? That range is on my short list of lenses to get. I shoot a Nikon camera, but I am considering the Sigma and Tamron 70-200 because the Nikon is incredibly expensive.
    Nikon, the last one before they went VR. I've been enjoying it. Will get out to the St. Patrick's Day parade in Chicago this weekend, and put it through its paces further. I'll report back in the Street & PJ forum. ;)
  • Options
    Mr. QuietMr. Quiet Registered Users Posts: 1,047 Major grins
    edited March 9, 2010
    Why not the one with VR? Sucks too much battery?
    If you work at something hard enough, you WILL achieve your goal. "Me"

    D200
    NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4 D
    Tamron SP AF90mm f/2.8 Di 1:1


    Welcome to my NEW website!

    Mr. Christoferson
  • Options
    MacushlaMacushla Registered Users Posts: 347 Major grins
    edited March 9, 2010
    Caspian wrote:
    Which 70-200 were you using? That range is on my short list of lenses to get. I shoot a Nikon camera, but I am considering the Sigma and Tamron 70-200 because the Nikon is incredibly expensive.

    I have a Sigma 70-210 2.8 lens, it is huge but I love it. i picked it up used in a local shop for $250.
  • Options
    ChiShutterChiShutter Registered Users Posts: 83 Big grins
    edited March 9, 2010
    Mr. Quiet wrote:
    Why not the one with VR? Sucks too much battery?
    Because I've been taking photos since December, and none of these lenses are within planets of my budget. A very generous colleague showed up in my office a couple of weeks ago with his 70-200 2.8, and insisted I borrow it. :ivar
Sign In or Register to comment.