Welcome to my world. I post a few photos here and there and never get much replies or any at all. Usually all the child photos get all the comments. (No offense )
Ok back to your photos. Are those your kids? I really like their expressions having fun in the Daisy field. I really like the last one.
That happens now and then here, no worries. Usually it means that the photos are oke (not really good, not bad). Like in this case Nice, colorful photos of cute kids
If you'd like to have more response, it sometime helps to ask a particular question: 'too much processing? I need more/less flash?' etc
Besides given and getting C&C, there are more reasons to post. I learn a lot just by looking at all the different photos or just getting ideas on locations for photo shoots, poses, PJ etc.
Welcome to my world. I post a few photos here and there and never get much replies or any at all. Usually all the child photos get all the comments. (No offense )
Ok back to your photos. Are those your kids? I really like their expressions having fun in the Daisy field. I really like the last one.
Thank you and only the little boy is mine. the little girl is his best friend.. his "girlfriend" as he calls her
Nice setting and sweet shots.
Couple of suggestions. I think I'd crop the first one a bit more (I think). The bare knee seems more of a distraction. The second one is just sweet! On the third one, I think the focus is a bit soft (could be the compression), but either way, I think you need to get down more, the flowers should still frame them well.
Nice setting and sweet shots.
Couple of suggestions. I think I'd crop the first one a bit more (I think). The bare knee seems more of a distraction. The second one is just sweet! On the third one, I think the focus is a bit soft (could be the compression), but either way, I think you need to get down more, the flowers should still frame them well.
thanks for the suggestions.. i think your right about cropping the first one.. his knee is distracting however do you think it will be to close of a crop?
Copy the image and try it out.... that's the beauty of the digital world. That's why I said "I think" as well, since I hadn't tried it out...
Okay, I tried...some rotations could be interesting depending on if there is more fields in the original, but just off this one: wf.jpg
Copy the image and try it out.... that's the beauty of the digital world. That's why I said "I think" as well, since I hadn't tried it out...
Okay, I tried...some rotations could be interesting depending on if there is more fields in the original, but just off this one: wf.jpg
Comments
Ok back to your photos. Are those your kids? I really like their expressions having fun in the Daisy field. I really like the last one.
If you'd like to have more response, it sometime helps to ask a particular question: 'too much processing? I need more/less flash?' etc
Besides given and getting C&C, there are more reasons to post. I learn a lot just by looking at all the different photos or just getting ideas on locations for photo shoots, poses, PJ etc.
www.warris.nl/blog
Couple of suggestions. I think I'd crop the first one a bit more (I think). The bare knee seems more of a distraction. The second one is just sweet! On the third one, I think the focus is a bit soft (could be the compression), but either way, I think you need to get down more, the flowers should still frame them well.
Who is wise? He who learns from everyone.
My SmugMug Site
thanks for the suggestions.. i think your right about cropping the first one.. his knee is distracting however do you think it will be to close of a crop?
Okay, I tried...some rotations could be interesting depending on if there is more fields in the original, but just off this one:
wf.jpg
Who is wise? He who learns from everyone.
My SmugMug Site
Glad you liked it.
Who is wise? He who learns from everyone.
My SmugMug Site
Like Andrew's crop. #2 is a super-sweet pic. No. 3 might benefit be being just a little bit lower angle, but overall very nice shots.