Options
Branden & Rachel wedding
Would like to hear the good and the bad on these, if you have the inclination. It's probably about my 7th wedding. It's my best yet, overall. The venue was not too photo friendly, but I made the best of the surroundings I think, for my ability.
*(I'm here again, after the 2 first comments, and I'm adding a #7 photo, which for some reason I forgot to place in here earlier.)*
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
*(I'm here again, after the 2 first comments, and I'm adding a #7 photo, which for some reason I forgot to place in here earlier.)*
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Canon 5D MK IV | 24-70 2.8L USM | 50mm F1.4 USM | 70-200mm F2.8L | AB 800 light | 430EXII speedlight (x2) | Lowel iLight | Cybersync remotes | bag of trail mix |
My Weddings Website • Blog •
My Weddings Website • Blog •
0
Comments
1) Love it!!
2) I think it's very pretty, but would also enjoy the same photo, but the couple not looking at the camera (but at each other)
3) I like it, very nice
4) Nice catch!
5) very nice photo, I'd desaturate their arms a bit, they look very red to me ...
6) Cool!
Well done!!
#6 is fun!
...and Angie, I will certainly take you up on your ideas. They are good ones.
I've just added a #7 photo, which I forgot earlier. Yes, I shot it in direct sunlight, but I THINK it's ok like that. But now that I look at it on here, I do see some funny skin tones. Ignore that. I'll fix it tomorrow.
Any other comments would be welcome!
My Weddings Website • Blog •
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.