Options

New tripod on the way!

cab.in.bostoncab.in.boston Registered Users Posts: 634 Major grins
edited July 22, 2010 in Accessories
I am so excited... yesterday I ordered a new tripod, ball head, and L-plate for my D300, and just got the shipping info. I'm so tired of dealing with the plastic tripod I've had for years with the pan/tilt head that neither locks down securely nor adjusts with any precision.

Since I'm purely a hobbyist, I couldn't justify (or afford) the really high-end stuff, as much as I'd love a CF Gitzo pod and RRS BH-55, but I think I'll still be very happy with what I have coming. I ordered Giottos MT-9371 legs (just about the only ones I could find that are tall enough for me), and a Kirk BH-3 head & L-plate. I figured that the heaviest possible set of gear that I'm ever going to have (unless and until I win the lottery - in which case I'll be able to afford another tripod) will be somewhere in the 9 pound range, and I won't be anywhere near that heavy for the near term. I think my heaviest combo I could assemble from my current kit is around 4 pounds, so I'm confident that the BH-3 is sufficient for my needs.

Now I just have to wait for the big brown truck to show up, most likely tomorrow. :barb:barb
Father, husband, dog lover, engineer, Nikon shooter
My site 365 Project

Comments

  • Options
    ImageX PhotographyImageX Photography Registered Users Posts: 528 Major grins
    edited July 19, 2010
    I am so excited... yesterday I ordered a new tripod, ball head, and L-plate for my D300, and just got the shipping info. I'm so tired of dealing with the plastic tripod I've had for years with the pan/tilt head that neither locks down securely nor adjusts with any precision.

    Since I'm purely a hobbyist, I couldn't justify (or afford) the really high-end stuff, as much as I'd love a CF Gitzo pod and RRS BH-55, but I think I'll still be very happy with what I have coming. I ordered Giottos MT-9371 legs (just about the only ones I could find that are tall enough for me), and a Kirk BH-3 head & L-plate. I figured that the heaviest possible set of gear that I'm ever going to have (unless and until I win the lottery - in which case I'll be able to afford another tripod) will be somewhere in the 9 pound range, and I won't be anywhere near that heavy for the near term. I think my heaviest combo I could assemble from my current kit is around 4 pounds, so I'm confident that the BH-3 is sufficient for my needs.

    Now I just have to wait for the big brown truck to show up, most likely tomorrow. wings.gifbarb

    Gotta love Christmas in July! Who would have thought that Santa wears brown too! Congrats on the new "toy". You'll likely be shocked that you put up with your old tripod for so long... once you start using the new one. Enjoy!
  • Options
    cab.in.bostoncab.in.boston Registered Users Posts: 634 Major grins
    edited July 19, 2010
    Gotta love Christmas in July! Who would have thought that Santa wears brown too! Congrats on the new "toy". You'll likely be shocked that you put up with your old tripod for so long... once you start using the new one. Enjoy!

    If by "put up with" you really mean "avoided using at all costs unless absolutely necessary b/c it annoyed me so much," then I totally agree! rolleyes1.gif
    Father, husband, dog lover, engineer, Nikon shooter
    My site 365 Project
  • Options
    Dan7312Dan7312 Registered Users Posts: 1,330 Major grins
    edited July 19, 2010
    [QUOTE=cab.in.boston;1424341 I ordered Giottos MT-9371 legs (just about the only ones I could find that are tall enough for me), and a Kirk BH-3 head & L-plate.[/QUOTE]


    thumb.gif I'm sure you will really be happy with it!
  • Options
    cab.in.bostoncab.in.boston Registered Users Posts: 634 Major grins
    edited July 19, 2010
    Dan7312 wrote: »
    thumb.gif I'm sure you will really be happy with it!

    Thanks, Dan. I really appreciate you letting me give yours a test drive. That really sealed the deal and assured me that I'd be good with the smaller ball head.

    I'll have this all set up and ready to go for the Photowalk in Boston on Saturday. clap.gif
    Father, husband, dog lover, engineer, Nikon shooter
    My site 365 Project
  • Options
    cab.in.bostoncab.in.boston Registered Users Posts: 634 Major grins
    edited July 21, 2010
    Gear arrived yesterday. I am thrilled! Surprisingly, it's actually a little TOO tall for me (I'm 6'5"). I had done the math a bunch of times, and I figured that at full height + ball head + camera height, the VF would be an inch or two lower than my eye level, so I could shoot comfortably standing up, either with a slight lean over, or adjusting the final height with the center column. But it turns out that I have to stand on tiptoes to get to the VF with the pod at full height and the center column down. So I'll have to learn how to set the legs a few inches less than fully extended.

    So far (just futzing around in the living room last night), I am very happy with the build quality and heft of the gear. This absolutely blows away my old POS. The Giottos pod is pretty neat. One can remove the center column, flip over the clamp, and remount the column horizontally (or whatever angle you choose) for macro work or shooting at odd angles. It comes with not only the normal 12-ish inch long center column, but also a stub that can be used for setting up at minimum height (still quite a bit taller than many higher-priced pods, though). The adjustable clamps can operate as a fully adjustable 3-way head. It comes with rubber tipped feet that cover up sharp spikes, so you have both options, plus a nice case that is just big enough to store the pod with the Kirk BH-3 mounted, so that's nice. It also has a strap for carrying the pod on your shoulder but not in the case. It's aluminum, so it's obviously heavier than the CF options, but really not *that* much. I think it's about 1.5-2 pounds heavier than some of the Gitzo CF pods that I spec'd out. For my shooting, I can't imagine that weight being a problem. All 3 legs have foam padding on them, which I imagine will help out in the cold. For a $230 set of legs, I think they're outstanding.

    The Kirk ball head and L-plate are fantastic, but I knew they would be. Maybe not quite as fancy as the RRS gear, but certainly no slouch. I really can't wait to get out and start using this setup in the field! wings.gifbarbwings.gif
    Father, husband, dog lover, engineer, Nikon shooter
    My site 365 Project
  • Options
    ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 23,901 moderator
    edited July 21, 2010
    Congratulations on the new tripod and head. clap.gif
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Options
    Art ScottArt Scott Registered Users Posts: 8,959 Major grins
    edited July 21, 2010
    CONGRATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Much better to have one that goes too tall than one that is too short......use a paint pen to mark your normal level veiw on the legs,
    so you can have a quick set up and not be trying to mentally measure each leg as you deploy them...........
    If you do any macro work that cool repositionable center column will be fantastic......keep something to use as a sandbag
    ( I use one of those reusable cloth grocery bags) with you so you will have the extra stability when needed.................
    "Genuine Fractals was, is and will always be the best solution for enlarging digital photos." ....Vincent Versace ... ... COPYRIGHT YOUR WORK ONLINE ... ... My Website

  • Options
    cab.in.bostoncab.in.boston Registered Users Posts: 634 Major grins
    edited July 21, 2010
    Art Scott wrote: »
    CONGRATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Much better to have one that goes too tall than one that is too short......use a paint pen to mark your normal level veiw on the legs,
    so you can have a quick set up and not be trying to mentally measure each leg as you deploy them...........

    Yes, I definitely agree it's better to have too much height than not enough.

    Excellent suggestion on the marking. I hadn't thought of that, and was kind of dreading the "mental measurement" each time... Thanks for that!
    Father, husband, dog lover, engineer, Nikon shooter
    My site 365 Project
  • Options
    Art ScottArt Scott Registered Users Posts: 8,959 Major grins
    edited July 21, 2010
    Yes, I definitely agree it's better to have too much height than not enough.

    Excellent suggestion on the marking. I hadn't thought of that, and was kind of dreading the "mental measurement" each time... Thanks for that!

    Also a "green" recyclable grocery bag is good to keep on had as a sandbag for extra stability.....
    "Genuine Fractals was, is and will always be the best solution for enlarging digital photos." ....Vincent Versace ... ... COPYRIGHT YOUR WORK ONLINE ... ... My Website

  • Options
    GadgetRickGadgetRick Registered Users Posts: 787 Major grins
    edited July 21, 2010
    Art Scott wrote: »
    CONGRATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Much better to have one that goes too tall than one that is too short....

    I'm not gonna touch that one...mwink.gif
  • Options
    imagesofhimimagesofhim Registered Users Posts: 527 Major grins
    edited July 21, 2010
    GadgetRick wrote: »
    I'm not gonna touch that one...mwink.gif

    rolleyes1.gif
    Blessings,
    Marjohn

    Images of Him Photography
  • Options
    Art ScottArt Scott Registered Users Posts: 8,959 Major grins
    edited July 22, 2010
    Originally Posted by Art Scott View Post
    CONGRATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Much better to have one that goes too tall than one that is too short....
    GadgetRick wrote: »
    I'm not gonna touch that one...mwink.gif

    Here we go taking me out of context....or did I mean that to go into the gutter...Hmmmmmm
    Yup think I did.....:D:D:D:D:D rolleyes1.gifrolleyes1.gif
    "Genuine Fractals was, is and will always be the best solution for enlarging digital photos." ....Vincent Versace ... ... COPYRIGHT YOUR WORK ONLINE ... ... My Website

Sign In or Register to comment.