Options
Cabo San Lucas Part II
nazquel
Registered Users Posts: 181 Major grins
Some more from my trip in June.
PLEASE PROVIDE C&C!!
1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
16)
PLEASE PROVIDE C&C!!
1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
16)
Navin Sarma
Washington, D.C., based landscape and fine art photographer
http://navinsarmaphotography.com/
Washington, D.C., based landscape and fine art photographer
http://navinsarmaphotography.com/
0
Comments
Washington, D.C., based landscape and fine art photographer
http://navinsarmaphotography.com/
Washington, D.C., based landscape and fine art photographer
http://navinsarmaphotography.com/
By lens distortion, do you mean polarization? In your opinion, should.I have toned down the polarization of the sky?
Washington, D.C., based landscape and fine art photographer
http://navinsarmaphotography.com/
My $.02 is that if you pared down on the number of shots you kept from this location, you'd have a much stronger set. A lot of these photos have unfavorable lighting or are similar shots of the same thing, which muddles the viewer by the time they reach the bottom. But this is definitely a place worth seeing. I think by honing them down to 4-5 (or even less) you can focus on polishing and perfecting just those, and make a stronger impact too.
Photos that don't suck / 365 / Film & Lomography
thanks for the advice... i'll place a couple less pictures in the post so that people can give me their thoughts.
something you mentioned - lots had unfavorable lighting... which one did you feel had that? 1, 2, 5 and 6?
Washington, D.C., based landscape and fine art photographer
http://navinsarmaphotography.com/
Duncan
Photo Blog