Were you using different lenses for these shots? I ask because one was at f 2.8 and the other at f 5.6. They're both a tad underexposed, I think, but the one at 5.6 is worse, even tho you'd bumped your ISO to 3200. I'd keep your ISO up there, so you don't have the motion blur that shows up in #1. White balance is troublesome under those lights isn't it.
John :
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
Were you using different lenses for these shots? I ask because one was at f 2.8 and the other at f 5.6. They're both a tad underexposed, I think, but the one at 5.6 is worse, even tho you'd bumped your ISO to 3200. I'd keep your ISO up there, so you don't have the motion blur that shows up in #1. White balance is troublesome under those lights isn't it.
yes i did use two different lenses .my 70 300 is canon and a buddies 70-200 2.8 (i want that lense badly)
Comments
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
I would recommend shooting near 70mm to keep it as f/4. Also, watch your white balance. The good news is that you're getting faces in the frames.
Keep on shooting...