Options
Do you think this is a good purchase ?
I'm not sure this is the place to ask this but if it isn't please let me know.
I've been looking at the Nikon 85mm 1.8 for a while but, since I don't have an immediate need for it and there are rumors of a replacement, I decided to wait.
Of course, I've always had a thing for the 85 1.4, but decided that it wasn't worth the extra price over the 1.8 version.
The 1.8 would cost me about 350€ new, and the 1.4D lists for 1070€, plus shipping. ( obviously not worth it )
However, I saw someone selling one in what looks like " like new " condition in a local forum for 800€, I decided to offer 700€ and they said they could consider it. What do you think ? Good deal ? It's not that I need the 1.4 but it's something I would definetly use. Also, it keeps it's value very well.
I've been looking at the Nikon 85mm 1.8 for a while but, since I don't have an immediate need for it and there are rumors of a replacement, I decided to wait.
Of course, I've always had a thing for the 85 1.4, but decided that it wasn't worth the extra price over the 1.8 version.
The 1.8 would cost me about 350€ new, and the 1.4D lists for 1070€, plus shipping. ( obviously not worth it )
However, I saw someone selling one in what looks like " like new " condition in a local forum for 800€, I decided to offer 700€ and they said they could consider it. What do you think ? Good deal ? It's not that I need the 1.4 but it's something I would definetly use. Also, it keeps it's value very well.
0
Comments
Facebook
500px
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
Facebook
500px
Use a single-LED flashlight to check for internal fungus/mold/mildew by shining through the lens. For a lens of this caliber I would also take a filter along to check the filter threads of the lens.
(Yes, there is a Nikkor 85mm, f1.4G series lens due soon, but the "D" series should still hold most of its value.)
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Absolutely, I planned on taking the camera and flashlight. Why single-led though ?
( the 1.4G is already out, I think you're thinking about a 1.8G, which is what I was talking about too )
Facebook
500px
A single-LED flashlight is very close to a point source of light, and it easily shows any haze internal to the lens. Sunlight, and other broad light sources, do not show the internal light scatter as well, and you can miss the problems of internal diffusion/dispersion.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
Qarik, I mostly shoot portraits. Thanks for your input.
Facebook
500px
Internal fungus/mold/mildew can be caused by improper storage of the lens or even a single exposure to rain, followed by prolonged storage in a camera bag. Internal fungus/mold/mildew will cause either localized or global internal haze during the flashlight test.
Look for the possibility of element separation, caused by lens cement breakdown. I would not expect this in a lens of recent manufacture.
While you are looking through the lens, move the focus and look (and feel) for any hesitation/stutter or sticking. Rack the aperture and look for a sticking diaphragm blade. Look for any visible oil on the diaphragm blades. (There should be none.)
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
This is how the lens in question looks:
Facebook
500px
The bottom line is that pretty much EVERY 85mm lens available for Nikon, is a killer lens. It just depends on how heavily that lens weighs into your style as a photographer. If 85mm defines your entire style, then yeah you probably want to spend as much as possible on that lens. If you're just looking to supplement a 2.8 zoom, then maybe the 1.8 is a great choice.
They're all incredibly sharp, and they all have amazing bokeh. To me, the main difference is in the accuracy and quietness of the two new 1.4's, the Nikon 85 AFS-G, and the Sigma 85 EX. They both have the new silent wave / hypersonic AF motor, which is incredibly accurate and consistent. Where the f/1.8 begins to mis-focus in dim light, the f/1.4 AFS-G is just getting started. I can consistently nail perfect sharpness even in light as low as ISO 6400, f/1.4, and 1/90 sec. That's DARK. The Sigma is almost that accurate and consistent, but I haven't tested it enough to know for sure. I'm personally still deciding which 85 to get myself, and I think I might wait and see if Nikon releases a new AFS-G version of the 85 1.8, because if it is accurate enough I might go for it instead. But honestly, if a sweet deal came along on ANY of the current 85's, I'd probably pounce on it.
:-)
=Matt=
My SmugMug Portfolio • My Astro-Landscape Photo Blog • Dgrin Weddings Forum
I agree, I've been needing a tele lens for a while to join my 18-70 and 50 1.8. The 85 1.8, new, is in the 300-400€ range, and is possibly going to get replaced soon. The sigma and the new 85 are much more expensive so I think this is a good compromise between price and quality.
Anyway, I met the seller to try out the lens today. Apart from some touches to the pain on the inside of the ( sweet metal ) hood and tiny specs of dust inside that you sometime also get in new lens, it was really impeccable. The bokeh and sharpness were really impressive even on the lcd. I bought it, my first pro grade lens
Will probably only be able to try it our on Sunday but I'm really liking what I saw so far. Build quality is also much higher than newer lens.
The only " downside " is that the receipt was from Hong Kong. I know that makes a difference for the Nikon USA warranty but here in Portugal I don't think it will make any difference, and even if it did the warranty has most likely already expired.
Thanks for eveyone's input once again.
Facebook
500px