Two girls and a Truck

Comments

• Options

  papadaka Registered Users Posts: 15 Big grins

  October 11, 2011 edited October 11, 2011

  Nice Chevy. Got any more images ? Please feel free to share.

  Mark Malter
  Photographer
  Wanna-Be
  Daddy
  Mark@Mark-Malter.com

  0
• Options

  djames Registered Users Posts: 237 Major grins

  October 11, 2011 edited October 11, 2011

  Good idea for a start. a couple of nit-pics from my perspective. in photo #1. the streaks across the photo are very distracting. I am not a fan of hiding areolas with a hand or arm. if they must be hidden there are other more attractive ways. In photo #2. what looks like a red logo makes the model look like she has a wierd sunburn at first glance. Again the hiding does not come off looking attractive. Good looking models and great location and lighting. IMHO

  http://www.djames-photography.com
  In this great big world around us, we will find what we are looking for! What we do with it is up to us to decide.
  Olympus E-500 Olympus E-520 Zuiko 14-45 Zuiko 40-150 Sigma 50-500 Zuiko 18-180 4-AB800 strobes, 1AB-400 stobe, 4 softboxes, brolly box, umbrellas etc.

  0
• Options

  Aspecto5 Registered Users Posts: 311 Major grins

  October 13, 2011 edited October 13, 2011

  I'm not digging the vignetting in #1. I think this image has enough interest in its own composition without that adding to it. I kind of agree with the earlier comment about arm placement, but the girl on the hood has her arm and hand placed in a more natural way the the girl on the roof.

  Canon 7D Shooter
  
  Nelson Lehner
  Dreamin' of a resolution!:D

  0
• Options

  JimKarczewski Registered Users Posts: 969 Major grins

  October 13, 2011 edited October 13, 2011

  Ditch the white Vignette. Really..
  
  Also, if you are going to put a logo across the image, do it with a little less opacity. As mentioned, it doesn't look like a logo on first view.. Looks like weird skin issues...

  Jim Karczewski - http://www.jimkarczewski.com

  0