Options

Shadow/s

bfjrbfjr Registered Users Posts: 10,980 Major grins
edited November 11, 2011 in Street and Documentary
Gone

Comments

  • Options
    lensmolelensmole Registered Users Posts: 1,548 Major grins
    edited November 7, 2011
    If I had to choose it would be no 2.
    Mind sharing the focal length you like to use for the street ?
  • Options
    bfjrbfjr Registered Users Posts: 10,980 Major grins
    edited November 9, 2011
    Shadows / Reposted
    Shadow1-L.jpg

    Shadow2-L.jpg

    Shadow3-L.jpg

    Perhaps this needs not be said, but please do not let my recent meltdown deter you from commenting or not.
  • Options
    bfjrbfjr Registered Users Posts: 10,980 Major grins
    edited November 9, 2011
    lensmole wrote: »
    If I had to choose it would be no 2.
    Mind sharing the focal length you like to use for the street ?

    At the moment I use a Canon QL17 (new in 1963), it has a fixed 40mm 1.7 lens.

    Thanks for asking :D
  • Options
    lensmolelensmole Registered Users Posts: 1,548 Major grins
    edited November 9, 2011
    bfjr wrote: »
    At the moment I use a Canon QL17 (new in 1963), it has a fixed 40mm 1.7 lens.

    Thanks for asking :D

    I think Bob Seager was humming a tune back in 1963 .

    Thanks for the info.
  • Options
    bfjrbfjr Registered Users Posts: 10,980 Major grins
    edited November 10, 2011
    lensmole wrote: »
    I think Bob Seager was humming a tune back in 1963 .

    Thanks for the info.

    A tad before Bob made his mark but he was humming along.
    One big hit from '63 was "Andy Williams", "Can't get used to loosing You"
    There were of course other goodies but I'll bet you know why I choose this one :D
  • Options
    lizzard_nyclizzard_nyc Registered Users Posts: 4,056 Major grins
    edited November 10, 2011
    The only one that kind of works for me is #1. Except for the guy walking out of the frame.
    Liz A.
    _________
  • Options
    bfjrbfjr Registered Users Posts: 10,980 Major grins
    edited November 11, 2011
    The only one that kind of works for me is #1. Except for the guy walking out of the frame.

    Kinda not good enough :D

    In fact I might have to throw up another attempt here in a bit mwink.gif
  • Options
    RSLRSL Registered Users Posts: 839 Major grins
    edited November 11, 2011
    None of them work for me Ben except #2, and that'd work better if the guy weren't sitting on that bench just behind the walker. Kertesz did something very similar to this, and you're on solid ground with what you tried to do. The problem with #1 is composition. As Liz said, everybody's clearing off to the left in the left side of the frame and there's nothing in the right side of the frame to balance the thing. The light's good in that one, though. #3 is just two back-lighted people on the street talking to each other.
  • Options
    bfjrbfjr Registered Users Posts: 10,980 Major grins
    edited November 11, 2011
    RSL wrote: »
    None of them work for me Ben except #2, and that'd work better if the guy weren't sitting on that bench just behind the walker. Kertesz did something very similar to this, and you're on solid ground with what you tried to do. The problem with #1 is composition. As Liz said, everybody's clearing off to the left in the left side of the frame and there's nothing in the right side of the frame to balance the thing. The light's good in that one, though. #3 is just two back-lighted people on the street talking to each other.

    Agree and disagree.
    #1 & #3 are coming up craps :D
    However in my defense there are four people in 3 mwink.gif

    #2 is my Fav and parly because of the kid on the bench headscratch.gif
  • Options
    michswissmichswiss Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 2,235 Major grins
    edited November 11, 2011
    I enjoy going out in strong light to find shadows, but in these cases they aren't quite strong enough or communicative for me. Of the set, the second is probably closest as the shadow is almost a character in itself.
Sign In or Register to comment.