Options

manual sort upload choice top or bottom of gallery

124»

Comments

  • Options
    leftquarkleftquark Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 3,784 Many Grins
    edited September 18, 2015
    We've pushed the bug fix live ... saving gallery settings will no longer cause the sort order of your galleries to change. Photos will continue to upload at the end, but at least the sort order you've chosen will stay the same sort order! Please let me how it works for you guys.
    dGrin Afficionado
    Former SmugMug Product Team
    aaron AT aaronmphotography DOT com
    Website: http://www.aaronmphotography.com
    My SmugMug CSS Customizations website: http://www.aaronmphotography.com/Customizations
  • Options
    dennismullendennismullen Registered Users Posts: 709 Major grins
    edited September 18, 2015
    It's hard to be impressed with this cop out. Everyone who migrated has already lost their sort order!
    See my gallery at http://www.dennismullen.com
  • Options
    RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,919 moderator
    edited September 19, 2015
    leftquark wrote: »
    We've pushed the bug fix live ... saving gallery settings will no longer cause the sort order of your galleries to change. Photos will continue to upload at the end, but at least the sort order you've chosen will stay the same sort order! Please let me how it works for you guys.
    Good news Aaron. clap.gif Thx.
  • Options
    leftquarkleftquark Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 3,784 Many Grins
    edited September 19, 2015
    It's hard to be impressed with this cop out. Everyone who migrated has already lost their sort order!

    The bug only effected people who migrated AND went into their gallery settings AND clicked save. If you were migrated and did not save any gallery settings, then your sort order will still be the same as in legacy.
    dGrin Afficionado
    Former SmugMug Product Team
    aaron AT aaronmphotography DOT com
    Website: http://www.aaronmphotography.com
    My SmugMug CSS Customizations website: http://www.aaronmphotography.com/Customizations
  • Options
    dennismullendennismullen Registered Users Posts: 709 Major grins
    edited September 20, 2015
    leftquark wrote: »
    The bug only effected people who migrated AND went into their gallery settings AND clicked save. If you were migrated and did not save any gallery settings, then your sort order will still be the same as in legacy.

    Your right, I should have said, "ALMOST" ...Everyone who migrated has already lost their sort order!
    Don't you think "ALMOST" everyone played with the gallery setting while customizing their NewSM?
    I appreciate the fact that you finally did something about this bug but for TWO YEARS this problem was known and "ALMOST"
    ...Everyone who migrated has already lost their sort order!

    Still we have lost this needed feature!

    Cheers,
    See my gallery at http://www.dennismullen.com
  • Options
    RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,919 moderator
    edited September 20, 2015
    Since I have been following this issue since it first surfaced, I believe I escaped harm. I have been careful not to touch the live galleries and am doing all my experiments in unimportant, unlisted galleries or brand new ones. I'll know for sure when I unveil, but so far so good. Besides, it gave me an excuse to put off moving to the new software mwink.gif.

    Dennis, I agreed with you that this was a serious bug for some and I also agree that it would be good to have the choice of inserting new pics at the top or bottom. But hey man, it's time to give this one a rest. :deadhorse
  • Options
    dennismullendennismullen Registered Users Posts: 709 Major grins
    edited September 20, 2015
    Richard wrote: »
    Dennis, I agreed with you that this was a serious bug for some and I also agree that it would be good to have the choice of inserting new pics at the top or bottom. But hey man, it's time to give this one a rest. :deadhorse

    If I had given it a rest, I doubt this bug would have been fixed!

    Cheers,
    See my gallery at http://www.dennismullen.com
  • Options
    leftquarkleftquark Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 3,784 Many Grins
    edited September 22, 2015
    If I had given it a rest, I doubt this bug would have been fixed!

    I'm glad you didn't! This was a bug we needed to fix.
    dGrin Afficionado
    Former SmugMug Product Team
    aaron AT aaronmphotography DOT com
    Website: http://www.aaronmphotography.com
    My SmugMug CSS Customizations website: http://www.aaronmphotography.com/Customizations
  • Options
    leftquarkleftquark Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 3,784 Many Grins
    edited September 22, 2015
    Don't you think "ALMOST" everyone played with the gallery setting while customizing their NewSM?

    SmugMug customers have hundreds, some even thousands of galleries and most users migrating don't go into galleries settings on every one of them as they browse. Typically Gallery Settings are most often looked at when the gallery is created; they're less viewed once a gallery is created. IF they did go into the settings and didn't want to change anything, clicking cancel would not cause the sort to change; only clicking Save would (again, the # of people clicking save without changing anything is fairly low). Additionally, the number of users who had the sorting method set to Position (Auto Sort = None) AND direction set to Descending is again, a small number (a strong majority sort by Date Taken). So while I'm sure there were some users effected by this, the number of fairly low, though it was an unpleasant bug for those that it did impact.
    dGrin Afficionado
    Former SmugMug Product Team
    aaron AT aaronmphotography DOT com
    Website: http://www.aaronmphotography.com
    My SmugMug CSS Customizations website: http://www.aaronmphotography.com/Customizations
  • Options
    dennismullendennismullen Registered Users Posts: 709 Major grins
    edited September 22, 2015
    leftquark wrote: »
    SmugMug customers have hundreds, some even thousands of galleries and most users migrating don't go into galleries settings on every one of them as they browse. Typically Gallery Settings are most often looked at when the gallery is created; they're less viewed once a gallery is created. IF they did go into the settings and didn't want to change anything, clicking cancel would not cause the sort to change; only clicking Save would (again, the # of people clicking save without changing anything is fairly low). Additionally, the number of users who had the sorting method set to Position (Auto Sort = None) AND direction set to Descending is again, a small number (a strong majority sort by Date Taken). So while I'm sure there were some users effected by this, the number of fairly low, though it was an unpleasant bug for those that it did impact.

    From personal experience, I have to disagree with this assessment.
    I see it more as a rationalization for not restoring this needed feature.
    And a denial of the grief it caused in the two years it took to finally admit there was a problem.

    Cheers,
    See my gallery at http://www.dennismullen.com
  • Options
    AllenAllen Registered Users Posts: 10,011 Major grins
    edited September 22, 2015
    I remember going through this many times on OldSmug in the forums, it was recommended to set sort
    to "none" "ascending" to get it to work correctly. Setting to "descending" could cause problems.
    Al - Just a volunteer here having fun
    My Website index | My Blog
Sign In or Register to comment.