Options

Surf City!

ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,907 moderator
edited December 14, 2004 in Holy Macro
Forget HB, it's all Santa Cruz baby...It was supposed to be 70(f) over in
Santa Cruz. I thought I'd swing on by and catch some surf shots. Bzzt. It
was about 50(f) and overcast.

I clearly need more practice at this because the frame after this shows very
clear air--but is out of focus.

12651781-M.jpg

12653494-M.jpg

12652253-M.jpg


I swung the camera around to catch these folks enjoying the contest...

12652573-M.jpg


Any advice would be very, very welcome!

Ian

P.S. Could we add a sports category?
Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?

Comments

  • Options
    wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited December 13, 2004
    Were you using autofocus? What lens and settings? ear.gif
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • Options
    ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,907 moderator
    edited December 13, 2004
    wxwax wrote:
    Were you using autofocus? What lens and settings? ear.gif
    Yes. AF + Servo mode. 1/200, f13. 500mm. The shutter speed is definetly
    too slow (or I should shoot with a tripod).

    ian
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • Options
    wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited December 13, 2004
    OMG, you were hand-held? wow, with a 500 I reckon you're right, a tripod would help. Also, at f13, the ol' autofocus might be a tad slow, no?
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • Options
    DoctorItDoctorIt Administrators Posts: 11,951 moderator
    edited December 13, 2004
    yeah, i second that wow! hand held 500 - how big are your arms? :D
    Erik
    moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]

  • Options
    ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,907 moderator
    edited December 13, 2004
    Sorry, I should have said I was on a mono-pod. I suppose you could hand-hold
    that....for about one or two shots in really bright light :D

    Light condition was constantly changing. The guy standing next to me had a rain
    cover over his camera eek7.gif But he was shooting w/heavy pod and a dampened head.
    That would have made panning easier.

    But yes, f13 is too slow for that. I tried multiple combinations of ss, iso and ap to
    find something that "worked".

    Check out this head shot...

    12652574-M.jpg

    This actually was hand-held. Had to pick it all up to swing over for the shot.


    Ian
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • Options
    ubergeekubergeek Registered Users Posts: 99 Big grins
    edited December 13, 2004
    f/13
    If you have the aperture set to f/13, the camera still uses the max aperture (whatever that is) to actually focus; it doesn't stop down to f/13 until just before tripping the shutter. (I'm not aware of any 500mm f/13 lenses, so I assume the stated aperture was what the camera was set to, not the max aperture of the lens.)

    Cheers,
    Jeremy
    wxwax wrote:
    OMG, you were hand-held? wow, with a 500 I reckon you're right, a tripod would help. Also, at f13, the ol' autofocus might be a tad slow, no?

    Jeremy Rosenberger

     Zeiss Ikon, Nokton 40mm f/1.4, Canon 50mm f/1.2, Nokton 50mm f/1.5, Canon Serenar 85mm f/2
    Canon Digital Rebel XT, Tokina 12-24mm f/4, Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm f/1.4, Canon 50mm f/1.4

    http://ubergeek.smugmug.com/
  • Options
    gusgus Registered Users Posts: 16,209 Major grins
    edited December 13, 2004
    Great shots ian...the photographers on the hill tell the story re the air temp.
  • Options
    ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,907 moderator
    edited December 13, 2004
    ubergeek wrote:
    If you have the aperture set to f/13, the camera still uses the max aperture (whatever that is) to actually focus; it doesn't stop down to f/13 until just before tripping the shutter. (I'm not aware of any 500mm f/13 lenses, so I assume the stated aperture was what the camera was set to, not the max aperture of the lens.)

    Cheers,
    Jeremy
    I might not have been clear in my reply. The combination of shutter/aperture
    are wrong for the shot. I would have been better off more open.

    You're right, the settings are exposure settings.

    Ian
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • Options
    gtcgtc Registered Users Posts: 916 Major grins
    edited December 13, 2004
    what a head!
    Check out this head shot...

    he certainly has quite a head on him...

    12652574-M.jpg

    This actually was hand-held. Had to pick it all up to swing over for the shot.


    Ian[/QUOTE]
    Latitude: 37° 52'South
    Longitude: 145° 08'East

    Canon 20d,EFS-60mm Macro,Canon 85mm/1.8. Pentax Spotmatic SP,Pentax Super Takumars 50/1.4 &135/3.5,Pentax Super-Multi-Coated Takumars 200/4 ,300/4,400/5.6,Sigma 600/8.
  • Options
    Steve CaviglianoSteve Cavigliano Super Moderators Posts: 3,599 moderator
    edited December 14, 2004
    ian408 wrote:
    Yes. AF + Servo mode. 1/200, f13. 500mm. The shutter speed is definetly
    too slow (or I should shoot with a tripod).

    ian
    Ian,
    With that good of light, I wouldn't bother with a tripod. I would, however, crank the speed up as high as you can (personally, I'd shoot for 1/1000 minimum). Maybe, widen the aperture up a bit too.

    Yep, you're doggone right about Surf City being in NorCal. Who ever heard of Huntington Beach? lol3.gif

    A few weekend's ago my wife dropped me off at the Lighthouse and let me shoot for 15 minutes while she circled (as usual, no parking available on the weekend). Anyhow, I got some decent results at from 226-500mm, handheld. Had that bright afternoon Sun off to my 2 o'clock, but I'm still pretty happy with the results I got :-)

    Here are a few:
    http://www.pbase.com/slo2k/image/36855042
    http://www.pbase.com/slo2k/image/37051397
    http://www.pbase.com/slo2k/image/36857243
    http://www.pbase.com/slo2k/image/36857732

    I need to go back when I can shoot a whole MD full of images mwink.gif Good luck on your next shoot :-)


    Steve
    SmugMug Support Hero
  • Options
    ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,907 moderator
    edited December 14, 2004
    Anytime you want to head down and shoot, let me know.

    ian
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • Options
    pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,696 moderator
    edited December 14, 2004
    ian408 wrote:
    I might not have been clear in my reply. The combination of shutter/aperture
    are wrong for the shot. I would have been better off more open.

    You're right, the settings are exposure settings.

    Ian


    If you are metering with a typical averaging light meter, I suspect that the white water in the waves could use +1 stop of exposure compensation so that the waves aren't so grey and underexposed. I think that is what you are saying aren't you?
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
  • Options
    ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,907 moderator
    edited December 14, 2004
    pathfinder wrote:
    If you are metering with a typical averaging light meter, I suspect that the white water in the waves could use +1 stop of exposure compensation so that the waves aren't so grey and underexposed. I think that is what you are saying aren't you?
    Hmmm. Now that you mention it, that might be worth trying.

    Any way, the second in the series is blurred. I think it's because of the
    shutter/aperture combination.

    Ian
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
Sign In or Register to comment.