Options

Canon Rebel center-point focus...HELP!!

PantherFanPantherFan Registered Users Posts: 20 Big grins
edited October 23, 2007 in Cameras
Hello to all,

I need some help. I am a Nikon sport shooter about to switch over to Canon. I borrowed a friend's Rebel XT (older model) body to try out a 70-200/2.8 lens I'm going to buy. For the life of me, I cannot figure out how to get this camera to fix on the center-point focus. I went through all the settings and just can't figure it out. I do not have access to a manual.

Please help!! I have several football games to shoot!

Thanks in advance.

Donnie

:dunno
There's no shame in not owning tools...just like there's no shame in holding your wife's purse...for a minute

:wink

Comments

  • Options
    TerrenceTerrence Registered Users Posts: 477 Major grins
    edited October 20, 2007
    Look on the back of the camera, upper right corner. You'll see a button that looks like a cross-hair. Press that button, then use the dial just behind the shutter button and look in the viewfinder. You'll see the focus points light up as you move the dial. When you are on center, press the shutter half-way and you're locked in.
    Terrence

    My photos

    "The future is an illusion, but a damned handy one." - David Allen
  • Options
    jdryan3jdryan3 Registered Users Posts: 1,353 Major grins
    edited October 20, 2007
    The Rebel XT manual is here. Go to Product/Software Manuals link and click it to download the PDF file.
    "Don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to. Oh well."
    -Fleetwood Mac
  • Options
    PantherFanPantherFan Registered Users Posts: 20 Big grins
    edited October 21, 2007
    You sir...are a fine American!
    Thanks a bunch. Worked like a champ. That just saved me a lot of frustration! Now, all of the shots that misfocused on me today...gotta fix for that one ;)

    :ivar
    Terrence wrote:
    Look on the back of the camera, upper right corner. You'll see a button that looks like a cross-hair. Press that button, then use the dial just behind the shutter button and look in the viewfinder. You'll see the focus points light up as you move the dial. When you are on center, press the shutter half-way and you're locked in.
    There's no shame in not owning tools...just like there's no shame in holding your wife's purse...for a minute

    :wink
  • Options
    ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 23,821 moderator
    edited October 21, 2007
    PantherFan wrote:
    Thanks a bunch. Worked like a champ. That just saved me a lot of frustration! Now, all of the shots that misfocused on me today...gotta fix for that one ;)

    :ivar

    If you post a link to a gallery, we could make a determination.

    I will tell you that using the Canon EF 70-200mm, f2.8L on both an XT/350D and a 1D MKII, the keeper rate more than doubled on the MKII for nightime football. People misunderstand when I say "responsive", but the responsiveness of the MKII really does make a tremendous difference.

    Galleries (I think the MKII stuff starts in Oct '06):

    http://ziggy53.smugmug.com/School/232835
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Options
    ccpickreccpickre Registered Users Posts: 385 Major grins
    edited October 21, 2007
    I have the XTi (400D) and I have to say, shooting sports with those lens on the XTi has been EXTREMELY difficult. The autofocus is severly crippled. With a 300 Prime it's even worse. You have to SERIOUSLY plan ahead, and anticipate where and when you will need to focus
    Vi Veri Vniversum Vivus Vici
  • Options
    PantherFanPantherFan Registered Users Posts: 20 Big grins
    edited October 22, 2007
    10-4 on the MKII..
    I do not plan on purchasing or using the XT past this weekend. I only used it to try out the 70-200/2.8. It actually worked pretty well. I shot around 1000 shots at a big all-day cheer competition and was surprised how well it worked. I got about 60-70% keepers. Which I thought was pretty good considering the lighting sucked bigtime. I know the XT has quite a few limitations, it was just all I had access to for the weekend.

    I will soon be purchasing a 30 or 40D. Can't quite afford a MKII right now.

    Thanks again for all of your input.

    DC
    ziggy53 wrote:
    If you post a link to a gallery, we could make a determination.

    I will tell you that using the Canon EF 70-200mm, f2.8L on both an XT/350D and a 1D MKII, the keeper rate more than doubled on the MKII for nightime football. People misunderstand when I say "responsive", but the responsiveness of the MKII really does make a tremendous difference.

    Galleries (I think the MKII stuff starts in Oct '06):

    http://ziggy53.smugmug.com/School/232835
    There's no shame in not owning tools...just like there's no shame in holding your wife's purse...for a minute

    :wink
  • Options
    sirsloopsirsloop Registered Users Posts: 866 Major grins
    edited October 22, 2007
    ccpickre wrote:
    I have the XTi (400D) and I have to say, shooting sports with those lens on the XTi has been EXTREMELY difficult. The autofocus is severly crippled. With a 300 Prime it's even worse. You have to SERIOUSLY plan ahead, and anticipate where and when you will need to focus

    I actually feel completely opposite about the XTi's AF. I found it quite resonsive and accurate with a 70-200/2.8L attached. Now I think my 40D has it beat hands down, but it was quite good with the XTi.
  • Options
    ccpickreccpickre Registered Users Posts: 385 Major grins
    edited October 23, 2007
    sirsloop wrote:
    I actually feel completely opposite about the XTi's AF. I found it quite resonsive and accurate with a 70-200/2.8L attached. Now I think my 40D has it beat hands down, but it was quite good with the XTi.
    Well yeah, don't get me wrong, the XTi is a great camera, but when I was using a 300 prime shooting field hockey, it was very slow, and the continuous shooting was worthless because by the second photo my subject was already out of focus. Granted I probably should have stopped it down to f.9, but I don't think it would have made a huge difference. Now, when I shot with my new 40D, it was a whole different experience. I don't think I will use my XTi for sports ever again (although that would make sense). That's not to say the XTi can't get great shots, but the focus and continuous shooting speeds of the 40D over the XTi are beyond words (makes me excited about maybe being able to purchase a 1DS MIII someday :D)

    And yes, when I used the 70-200 it was a little better, but still not as quick as with my 40D. One thing you have to consider, is whether the players are running towards or away from you, or just to the side.
    Vi Veri Vniversum Vivus Vici
  • Options
    sirsloopsirsloop Registered Users Posts: 866 Major grins
    edited October 23, 2007
    the 1dIII is ridiculous.... 1dmk3.gif
  • Options
    ccpickreccpickre Registered Users Posts: 385 Major grins
    edited October 23, 2007
    sirsloop wrote:
    the 1dIII is ridiculous.... 1dmk3.gif
    I bet the 1DS III is more ridiculous, that's why I want it :D
    Vi Veri Vniversum Vivus Vici
  • Options
    sirsloopsirsloop Registered Users Posts: 866 Major grins
    edited October 23, 2007
    ccpickre wrote:
    I bet the 1DS III is more ridiculous, that's why I want it :D

    In terms of FPS its not... its like 4-5fps out of the 1Ds, but thats a 21MP camera!!! Thats still AMAZING considering the file sizes you'd be dealing with. In terms of being able to crop out 3/4 of the image and still have a 5Mp photo... thats the ridiculous part..
  • Options
    salazarsalazar Registered Users Posts: 392 Major grins
    edited October 23, 2007
    sirsloop wrote:
    the 1dIII is ridiculous.... 1dmk3.gif

    Just how many frames are in this gif?
    Please feel free to retouch and repost my images. Critique, Suggestions, and Technique tips always welcomed. Thanks for your interest.
  • Options
    sirsloopsirsloop Registered Users Posts: 866 Major grins
    edited October 23, 2007
    HAHAH... 87... and it was actually shot RAW.
  • Options
    ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 23,821 moderator
    edited October 23, 2007
    salazar wrote:
    Just how many frames are in this gif?

    I show 87 frames. Less than 9 seconds I believe.

    (SS beat me to it.)
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Options
    sirsloopsirsloop Registered Users Posts: 866 Major grins
    edited October 23, 2007
    I have another one I did where I shot like IDK... 200 frames on L walking around someone with a 24-70/2.8L zoomed in just on their head. It was on my bosses memory card tho. rolleyes1.gif Woulda been sweet!
  • Options
    salazarsalazar Registered Users Posts: 392 Major grins
    edited October 23, 2007
    ziggy53 wrote:
    I show 87 frames. Less than 9 seconds I believe.

    (SS beat me to it.)

    OK Ziggy, I need a computer lesson now (or point me to a tutorial somewhere if you don't mind). I know how sirsloop counted the frames, he made the gif (I've never mad a gif before, is there a tutorial for that somewhere?) (I'm so green...), but how did you count them?
    Please feel free to retouch and repost my images. Critique, Suggestions, and Technique tips always welcomed. Thanks for your interest.
  • Options
    ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 23,821 moderator
    edited October 23, 2007
    salazar wrote:
    OK Ziggy, I need a computer lesson now (or point me to a tutorial somewhere if you don't mind). I know how sirsloop counted the frames, he made the gif (I've never mad a gif before, is there a tutorial for that somewhere?) (I'm so green...), but how did you count them?

    I just brought the file into Adobe ImageReady and checked the number of frames there (under the "Animation" tab).

    There are other software titles that can do similar, but ImageReady was handy. Just don't ask me how to create an animated GIF because I have to learn the process over again each time I do it. :D
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Options
    sirsloopsirsloop Registered Users Posts: 866 Major grins
    edited October 23, 2007
    You can download a free trial of ulead gif animator 5... a nice little tool for making these. It literally took longer to convert to JPG...
  • Options
    ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 23,821 moderator
    edited October 23, 2007
    sirsloop wrote:
    You can download a free trial of ulead gif animator 5... a nice little tool for making these. It literally took longer to convert to JPG...

    I used that at work and it was pretty nice. The last time I had a short animation to make, I used UnFREEz:

    http://www.whitsoftdev.com/unfreez/

    Under 20k Freeware. Drag-n-drop easy.

    I've also used ImageReady but it was such a pain ...
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Options
    salazarsalazar Registered Users Posts: 392 Major grins
    edited October 23, 2007
    ziggy53 wrote:
    I just brought the file into Adobe ImageReady and checked the number of frames there (under the "Animation" tab). :D

    I just tried that, it worked. Thank you. I've never used Image Ready for anything before, it's just one of those things on my computer.
    Please feel free to retouch and repost my images. Critique, Suggestions, and Technique tips always welcomed. Thanks for your interest.
Sign In or Register to comment.