Options

First wedding w/ the 17-55 and Lightsphere

ShimaShima Registered Users Posts: 2,547 Major grins
edited May 27, 2008 in Weddings
Finally got to test out the 17-55 and Lightsphere in a wedding setting. Pretty pleased, but was pretty annoyed at how fast the Lightsphere drained my batteries... though I reallllly like the effects the lightsphere gives, so it's a love hate relationship, lol.

1) Maid of Honor
301591061_J8icy-M.jpg

2) The bride after getting her makeup on
301592430_e7WNc-M.jpg

3) The rings
301592679_3LvH2-M.jpg

4) One of the bridesmaids
301593376_eqniD-M.jpg

5) A son of one of the bridesmaids
301595500_4uNKc-M.jpg

6) The rings on their hands (two of her fingers are tucked under her hand since her cuticles had several cuts and she wanted to hide that)
301599456_6Cavy-M.jpg

7) They didn't play nice w/ the cake
301602413_c4zLp-M.jpg

8) I love how the lightsphere lit up this couple
301601565_Pergf-M.jpg

9) Another adorable child
301597787_2pDsT-M.jpg

10) No ligthsphere but this is pretty funny (just bounce flash)
301603802_g6FKz-M.jpg

11) 70-200 and bounce flash only
301605577_7UKNn-M.jpg

12) Also 70-200 and bounce flash only
301605901_S8LiN-M.jpg


Sorry there were so many, I had a hard time narrowing them down!

Feedback welcomed as usual.

Comments

  • Options
    MarkWMarkW Registered Users Posts: 72 Big grins
    edited May 26, 2008
    Cat,

    You've got some nice shots there! I have a love/hate relationship with my lightspere too. It will definately kill batteries quickly. Lately I've been just using a better bounce card instead of the lightsphere to push more light forward and not waste the flash in directions you don't need.

    I think your bounce shots are nice but the one thing I hate about bouncing on the ceiling is the dark eye sockets it cause (like #11 for instance).

    Still you got some great shots nonetheless. I think my next lens purchase will be 17-55!
    Mark Warren
    EOS 50D, 30D, Sigma 50-150 f/2.8, Tamron 28-75 f/2.8, MF Pentax 50 f/1.4, MF 70-200 f/4.0, and a MF 200 f/4 adapted for Canon, Canon 580EXII and 430EX, 2 Vivitar 285HV's and many various modifiers.
    http://www.markwphoto.com
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/markwphoto/
  • Options
    Moogle PepperMoogle Pepper Registered Users Posts: 2,950 Major grins
    edited May 26, 2008
    Looking good! wow they are really sharp!

    Lightsphere drains the flash batteries?
    Food & Culture.
    www.tednghiem.com
  • Options
    MarkWMarkW Registered Users Posts: 72 Big grins
    edited May 26, 2008
    Yes it does. You have to use more flash exposure compensation or open up you aperture to properly light your subject. Also because the lightspere is circular it spreads the light 360 degrees. Your light is thrown behind you in directions that many times don't contribute to your exposure.
    Mark Warren
    EOS 50D, 30D, Sigma 50-150 f/2.8, Tamron 28-75 f/2.8, MF Pentax 50 f/1.4, MF 70-200 f/4.0, and a MF 200 f/4 adapted for Canon, Canon 580EXII and 430EX, 2 Vivitar 285HV's and many various modifiers.
    http://www.markwphoto.com
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/markwphoto/
  • Options
    jeffreaux2jeffreaux2 Registered Users Posts: 4,762 Major grins
    edited May 26, 2008
    Excellent flash work Cat!!! ...and your processing looks sharp as well!thumb.gif
  • Options
    ShimaShima Registered Users Posts: 2,547 Major grins
    edited May 26, 2008
    MarkW wrote:
    Yes it does. You have to use more flash exposure compensation or open up you aperture to properly light your subject. Also because the lightspere is circular it spreads the light 360 degrees. Your light is thrown behind you in directions that many times don't contribute to your exposure.

    Yup, nailed that one on the head there.

    And yeah, I only started doing bounce only instead of lightsphere since it was the first time I used the lightsphere at a wedding and I was running out of batteries... so for the last half of the reception I chose to do no lightsphere so I wouldn't run out of batteries... hence the dark shadows under the eyes :(

    And in response to Moogle - yeah, this 17-55 is VERY sharp, mmm sharpness.
  • Options
    ShimaShima Registered Users Posts: 2,547 Major grins
    edited May 26, 2008
    jeffreaux2 wrote:
    Excellent flash work Cat!!! ...and your processing looks sharp as well!thumb.gif
    Thanks!
  • Options
    ChatKatChatKat Registered Users Posts: 1,357 Major grins
    edited May 26, 2008
    Really nice
    Yes, very nice Fong Dong Work! Something I think I am going to try with it is to line the back side with some black foam from the craft store to throw the light forward only. I like the look it gives, although everyone always thinks it's a funny looking thing on the flash.
    Kathy Rappaport
    Flash Frozen Photography, Inc.
    http://flashfrozenphotography.com
  • Options
    ShimaShima Registered Users Posts: 2,547 Major grins
    edited May 26, 2008
    ChatKat wrote:
    Yes, very nice Fong Dong Work! Something I think I am going to try with it is to line the back side with some black foam from the craft store to throw the light forward only. I like the look it gives, although everyone always thinks it's a funny looking thing on the flash.

    One guest at the reception actually asked me what it was with a funny look, but then thought it was realllllly cool after I explained it, heh.

    I am almost contemplating the chrome dome... it increases the power and makes sure it bounces forward... but it costs more than I paid for the lightsphere itself, which is holding me back....
  • Options
    PhotosbychuckPhotosbychuck Registered Users Posts: 1,239 Major grins
    edited May 26, 2008
    Great Photos!
    I like #3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10 & 12 the best.


    Take Care,
    Chuck,
    D300S, 18-200mm VR, 70-300mm VR

    Aperture Focus Photography
    http://aperturefocus.com
  • Options
    Scott_QuierScott_Quier Registered Users Posts: 6,524 Major grins
    edited May 27, 2008
    You got some very nice photos there - I'm very glad you like that 17-55. It's one of my favorites.

    The LS - well, I don't use it any more. I use, instead, the better bounce card as it's more efficient and produces much the same effect - at least for me.

    Good going with the wedding shots - you got some real memories there and that's part of what it's all about.
Sign In or Register to comment.