Thank you!
When I saw your still water entry I thought it's simply a muddy water.
However, this entry has the same muddy feeling to it. I can think of several things, like:
underexposed
too many filters (maybe dirty ones)
This still can be improved in post processing, methinks...
Nik,
I agree. I noticed it today when I posted it from the office. I had not earlier. I am looking into it now. I also noticed it is only in the shots I took in that area. This shot and the still water shot were taken with-in 20 feet of each other. I know it is not light becuaese the angles are diffrent in both shots so I am looking into my notes to see why.
PhotoJ
PS
I did a quick look into it and a re-work. Looks like I never touched the levels when I was post processing the image. Which could be the case..a lady did drop by and ask me to shoot her wedding while I was working on these images. Its better but I still see room for improvement.
Comments
When I saw your still water entry I thought it's simply a muddy water.
However, this entry has the same muddy feeling to it. I can think of several things, like:
- underexposed
- too many filters (maybe dirty ones)
This still can be improved in post processing, methinks...I agree. I noticed it today when I posted it from the office. I had not earlier. I am looking into it now. I also noticed it is only in the shots I took in that area. This shot and the still water shot were taken with-in 20 feet of each other. I know it is not light becuaese the angles are diffrent in both shots so I am looking into my notes to see why.
PhotoJ
PS
I did a quick look into it and a re-work. Looks like I never touched the levels when I was post processing the image. Which could be the case..a lady did drop by and ask me to shoot her wedding while I was working on these images. Its better but I still see room for improvement.
Jason
Paulo Campos
My photos at Flickr