Options
Banding as a tell-tell sign of postprocessing
Nikolai
Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
Whenever I deal with any type of artificailly created gradient (I use PS, but I don't think it matters), be it a result of a blur or a gradient tool I immediately start noticing banding issue when resizing.
What bugs me the most is that when a seemingly identical gradient comes from the camera (example - light's falling off on a solid color background), the issue doesn't exist at all or only presents itself at extreme compression/reduction values.
What I would like to be able to do is to "revitalize" such artificially introiduced gradients to their original, non-banding-prone quality.
Any ideas?
What bugs me the most is that when a seemingly identical gradient comes from the camera (example - light's falling off on a solid color background), the issue doesn't exist at all or only presents itself at extreme compression/reduction values.
What I would like to be able to do is to "revitalize" such artificially introiduced gradients to their original, non-banding-prone quality.
Any ideas?
"May the f/stop be with you!"
0
Comments
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
Are you sure its banding in the image, not on the display?
Author "Color Management for Photographers"
http://www.digitaldog.net/
It does not take very much added noise to defeat the banding in a gradient.
Computer generated gradients are notorious at being displayed with banding, some of which can be display sizing related, and not seen at other image sizes or in prints. But adding a bit of noise should cure it.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Thank you for the quick response guys!
Will try the noise!
An edit to a *perfect* CG grad will degrade the gradient (simple matter of input tones to output tones before and after the edit). When making a CG grad, one can choose to add a minor LSB "dither" effect to help avoid banding - although usually if there will be banding then one may need more aggressive dither than what is built into the gradient tool or in colour conversions.
One is computer generated, perfect.
The other (camera, natural gradient) is far from "perfect" (although a raw may be better than a JPG).
You are comparing apples to oranges.
Sure - don't edit them, or if you have to, regenerate them.
The above is not so practical, so this is why some folk make noise about noise.
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~binaryfx/howto_smartnoise.html
Further reading:
http://www.ledet.com/margulis/ACT_postings/ColorCorrection/ACT-Banding-16-20bit-8-bit.htm
Stephen Marsh
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~binaryfx/
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~binaryfx/
http://prepression.blogspot.com/