Options

Dragon Flies and Damsel Flies

HumpreyCogayHumpreyCogay Registered Users Posts: 55 Big grins
edited October 17, 2008 in Holy Macro
Here are some macro shots I took last saturday =)... C and C are welcome

393113453_Hmm4z-M.jpg

393114790_vFXLi-M.jpg

393113283_om7DN-M.jpg

393114961_b4wTo-M.jpg

393113597_y9PJU-M.jpg

Comments

  • Options
    GOLDENORFEGOLDENORFE Super Moderators Posts: 4,747 moderator
    edited October 13, 2008
    good shots, think i like #1 best for composition.
    phil
    Phil

    moderator - Holy Macro
    Goldenorfe’s Flickr Gallery
    Goldenorfe photography on Smugmug
    Phils Photographic Adventures Blog
  • Options
    HumpreyCogayHumpreyCogay Registered Users Posts: 55 Big grins
    edited October 13, 2008
    Thank you Sir Phil =).....
  • Options
    Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited October 15, 2008
    Lovely dragonfly and damsel series.
    Some have some blown areas - assume these are natural light ?

    For natural light macros I tend to shoot -.66EC on the camera and use RAW to compensate for any underexposure- does help stop strong highlights.
    Brian V.
    Brian V.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
    http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
  • Options
    HumpreyCogayHumpreyCogay Registered Users Posts: 55 Big grins
    edited October 15, 2008
    Lord Vetinari wrote:
    Lovely dragonfly and damsel series.
    Some have some blown areas - assume these are natural light ?

    For natural light macros I tend to shoot -.66EC on the camera and use RAW to compensate for any underexposure- does help stop strong highlights.
    Brian V.

    Wow thanks for the tip sir... I will surely do it, I am going to shoot this sunday morning again.. =)...
    What .66EC sir?
  • Options
    ritewingerritewinger Registered Users Posts: 243 Major grins
    edited October 16, 2008
    I believe he is referring to exposure compensation. These are nice to view, btw.
  • Options
    HumpreyCogayHumpreyCogay Registered Users Posts: 55 Big grins
    edited October 17, 2008
    ritewinger wrote:
    I believe he is referring to exposure compensation. These are nice to view, btw.

    Thank you sir....

    Sorry for my ignorance... but I have checked the exposure compensation in my camera and its by +1 +2 -1 -2 values =(.... What is .66? thanks again guys...
Sign In or Register to comment.