Search
-
Re: Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM and EF 35mm f/2 IS USM
-
Re: Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM and EF 35mm f/2 IS USM
24-70: Umm, yeah I guess more choice is a good thing but I don't get it. If I'm going to give up a whole stop of light, I want to be paid back in reach or width. This lens had better absolutely demolish the 24-105 for IQ to justify its existence! Maybe if it was 20-70 or 17-70 or 24-85 I could see the point. Man if it was… -
Re: Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM and EF 35mm f/2 IS USM
I've been pondering this one as well. It looks smaller than the 2.8, which could mean lighter. Those of us who own a Mark I 24-70 f/2.8L never forget how heavy that beast is. So we could gain lightness and smaller size. Maybe it rocks in terms of image quality. Canon increased the sharpness on the new 2.8 by a very great… -
Re: Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM and EF 35mm f/2 IS USM
I'm very tempted by the 35/2 IS for the reduced size and weight. Handling my camera with the 35L on it is not that much different than with the 24-70L. I loved the handling with my old 35/2, but I went to the L for the autofocus and IQ. Now that the new 35/2 has USM and better MTF, I think I'll switch back and pocket a few…
14 results