Search
-
Re: Canon 24-70 f2.8L ii or Canon 24-70 f4.0 IS?
-
Re: Canon 24-70 f2.8L ii or Canon 24-70 f4.0 IS?
, they always end up buying the most expensive one, I dunno why we try so hard to save them some money. ;-) Okay in all seriousness, have you given any thought to what I said earlier about how it depends what you shoot? If you shoot regular landscapes, at f/11 and f/16 all day long, and if you lug these lenses around on… -
Re: Canon 24-70 f2.8L ii or Canon 24-70 f4.0 IS?
Starting with "landscape photography", a landscape image may be captured with virtually any lens, from a fisheye, through wide-angle, standard/normal, and telephoto (including super-telephoto). There is no single lens which can capture all forms of landscape photography. Often people refer to scenic and vista landscapes… -
Re: Canon 24-70 f2.8L ii or Canon 24-70 f4.0 IS?
I assume you're talking about the 24mm f/1.4 L? In which case I cannot recommend it for most applications other than, well, stars at night or extremely low-light photojournalism. For any other use, it is overkill and a waste of money. Heck, even then if you're into stars you should buy the Rokinon / Bower / Samyang 24 1.4…
14 results