Search
-
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
-
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
-
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
-
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
-
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
It might show more sunlight but then The 35L was shot at sunset (which was 8:15ish) while the 24-105 was about 10 minutes earlier. Given where the sun sets, I could understand why 10 minutes would make a difference in the amount of apparent light. Note too the difference in exposure (and the position of the ship--behind… -
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
-
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
SpeshulEd: The 10-22 is just way too much fun for landscapes (and more!). I would not part w/ it unless I were going FF. (The fact that I picked it up 2nd-hand and don't have much invested in it helps too!) Waxy: You've lost me. We were talking 17-40 as an alternative to the 24-105 for APS people (like me) because it is… -
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
I've bought and sold and tried out a lot of lenses and have found no other lens as useful, versatile, and satisfying as the 24-105L. No other lens remains in my bag no matter where I'm going and what I'm shooting. Love it!! Some shots from a trip back east earlier this month: And some from a boat ride on Lake Texoma in… -
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
Camera shake isn't the only reason to have big apertures. Faster autofocus Better depth of field control Lower ISO Faster shutter speed at same ISO Plus, there's the argument that you have to stop down a lens to get its best performance. The 24-70 is not wide open at f4. But I've read that some owners find the two lenses… -
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
I think I want one of these lenses, my only concern is I'd like to be using it sometimes in a concert type atmosphere. I was planning on getting the canon 28-70 f/2.8L, but this seems like more for my money. I'm concerned that f/4 might not be a fast enough lens for concert shooting, but with numbers like these "20D f/4…
41 results