Search
-
EF-S Wants
Ok, so many people are happy with this 10-22 EF-S lens, I want something too. Is Canon listening? Pick one. All with image stabilization (modes 1 and 2): 300/2.8L EF-S 400/4L EF-S 100-400/4L EF-S With all the benefits of the S mount, just how much smaller or better could these lenses be, given the smaller image circle and… -
Re: EF-S Wants
About EF-S... EF-S lenses place the rear element further back into the camera body, which is what renders them incompatible with non-EF-S mounts. As I understand it, this provides an advantage with wide-angle lenses, but it's not clear that telephoto lenses would benefit similarly. Now, it also happens that Canon doesn't… -
Re: EF-S Wants
-
Re: EF-S Wants
-
Re: EF-S Wants
-
Re: EF-S Wants
-
Re: EF-S Wants
-
Re: EF-S Wants
Its not that reason I'm wanting the lenses I asked for. And maybe I'm actually asking for the wrong thing. What I was assuming was that if you make an EF-S telephoto, it will be smaller than an EF unit. Thus, a 400/4 for the size of a 400/5.6? It appears not to be the case, however. How about simply adding IS to a… -
Re: EF-S Wants
I'm no optical engineer, but I agree w/ what ubergeek said. It is my understanding that the returns in terms of reduced lens weight and size diminish as focal length increases. Eventually you get to the point where it's nearly the same cost, size and weight regardless of sensor size. .. That's as I've been told anyhow.… -
Re: EF-S Wants
So what you want is 400mm effective at f/4.. IE a 250mm (400mm divided by 1.6) f/4.. Which they have a pretty close match of (ignoring costs) in the 300/4.. or better yet the 200/2.8.. I don't think EF versions of these same lenses would be much cheaper, lighter, or smaller. At least not from what I've been told. Sorry to…
10 results