Search
-
Re: So what did we do wrong?
-
Re: So what did we do wrong?
The glass in the 17-55 is "L" quality - really it is. What is missing and what makes it not and "L" is the build quality and the "-S" designation. I have some of both ("L" and non-"L") lenses and, seriously, can not tell the difference between shots from my 17-55, 24-105 f/4L IS, or my 70-200 f/2.8L IS. As for working on… -
Re: So what did we do wrong?
-
Re: So what did we do wrong?
-
Re: So what did we do wrong?
I had a typo....I meant 17-85 IS and am convinced this is the issue. IS was left on and mounted. It is possible the focus point never picked it up anywhere on the entire photo but it is hard to believe that at least something in the frame would be in focus....apparently nothing is and why I believe it is due to the IS. -
Re: So what did we do wrong?
This looks very similar to a shot leaving the IS on when camera is mounted on a tripod...which is a no no. Yes, some Canon lenses allow that but am not certain of the 17-55. The 28-135 if mounted, leaving the IS on will produce this look. It appears there is camera shake as would make sense considering the gyro… -
Re: So what did we do wrong?
Yes, but once again we are not talking about this lens. The lens in question is the 17-85 f/4-5.6. This is not true. A 17-85mm EF-S lens has the effective focal length of a 27.2-136mm lens on a full frame body. The "-S" in the EF-S line up refers to the mount and has no affect on the focal length. I am extremely surprised… -
Re: So what did we do wrong?
Well my mistake on the lens and the IS. The IS is most likely the culprit here. And $1000 is cheap for a f2.8 L glass lens. But the 17-55 isn't L glass and according to the OP, it's not a 2.8 lens either. I'm also convinced that an EFS lens is simply "cheap" because it only works on certain, cropped sensor cameras. Why… -
Re: So what did we do wrong?
The 17-55 is a kit lens with no IS, so that's not the issue. But the lens is a cheaper lens so it's not going to shoot as clearly as more expensive L-glass. Looks to me like your key light is lighting up your background a bit too, which in this case probably isn't a good idea. Either move the light closer to your subjects…
9 results