Search
-
Re: Canon Primes
-
Re: Canon Primes
-
Re: Canon Primes
I have these lenses and on a crop factor camera the 100 2.8 is slower focusing than the 85. I think that it's a wonderful lens for situations where you have good light control like studio or daylight. If I had to pick between these two, the 85 would be my choice and it's less money. All that said, if I could only shoot… -
Re: Canon Primes
-
Re: Canon Primes
I'd do the opposite :) The increase in IQ from the 100/2 to the 135/2 is marginal (imho), the increase in price is threefold. I shoot my Canon 100/2 wide open at f/2 all the time, it's tack sharp. $300 well spent, $600 well saved ... :D Then add the 50/1.4 for 3/4 to full-body portraits, and maybe the 200/2.8II for all… -
Re: Canon Primes
I have a Tamron 17-50, 50 1.8, and 85 1.8, which I use with my xsi, but I used to have an XT. I used my 50mm on my XT and yes, it's sometimes a pain, but it does get PHENOMENAL results if you're willing to live with its occasional foibles. I can't say I'd recommend it for fast action although that said, it did a great job…
6 results