Search
-
Re: Flat contrast lacking pictures in galleries
In my experience, there's often heartburn among photographers to convert from Adobe 98 to sRGB because they feel sRGB is somehow inferior. Actually, for display on the web and for making prints that use a photographic process, like almost all commercial printers do, sRGB is a superior space to Adobe 98. Here's why:… -
Re: Flat contrast lacking pictures in galleries
I can check that, but I always work in the same way. Previous uploads had all the correct contrast. I will check on the space I worked in. Thanks for the tip. I checked and they are in Adobe RGB 98, which is the space I always use... My originals are far more contrasty then the ones uploaded. They look terrible... -
Re: Flat contrast lacking pictures in galleries
Scott's a really great teacher and tips meister. A lot of his secrets and shortcuts are pure gold. I don't think anyone has accused him of being great technically. The idea of saving tiffs (lossless files that you can alter and save to your heart's content without degrading them) is great. Saving to a color space that has… -
Re: Flat contrast lacking pictures in galleries
Scott Kelby doesn't anymore. :D The sRGB tide swept commercial printers and the Internet and he recently jumped on the bandwagon. The prepress guys like Bruce Fraser, Andrew Rodney, etc., are very smart but they have no background in consumer devices like television. The Internet has to work on TVs and TVs on the Internet,…
4 results