Search
-
Re: NO Images - but a serious question.
-
Re: NO Images - but a serious question.
For the 24-70 range, I don't think 2.8 is a big difference from f4. I would keep what you have. A cheaper option is to look at used 85 1.8 and 1.4 lenses as well as the 135 mm. I like my 85 1.8 because it is still small, but does give me a bit of compression over my 50mm 1.8. I think the 2.8 difference is notable on the… -
Re: NO Images - but a serious question.
-
Re: NO Images - but a serious question.
-
Re: NO Images - but a serious question.
Well thanks all. The little bout of 24 hour gear flu seeme to have passed. For the moment, I'm sticking with my current lineup. Jon, et al., you're right that 135 and 85 are not too long outdoors and I may consider one next year but I'm headed indoors and don't really have room for even my 70-200 indoors. -
Re: NO Images - but a serious question.
I've quit using the 28-70. It's heavy and I don't really want to shoot at 2.8. The folks here love the bokeh effect but it's never done much for me. I've been very happy with the 24-105 and the 70-200. I can get just about any effect I want with those. there is something about the compression of the 70-200 that is hard to…
6 results