Search
-
Re: Bokeh
-
Re: Bokeh
Yes cjmchch, I think they meant that if you really had good bokeh that you wouldn't be able to define the flowers in the background, or the building. I think they could have said you bokeh had too distinct shapes, to me that would be a better description of the situation vs saying the bokeh is too sharp. -
Re: Bokeh
While it's true that to some extent, bokeh is subjective, after a careful reading of the "Bokeh Test" reference, I thought I could readily discern truly good from truly bad bokeh. In fact I thought I could tell the best lens from the one that basically came second - when it was presented to me.:D I thought some of the… -
Bokeh
I recently took a photo for an assignment titled Bokeh and the below photo was my entry. Now while I accept it isn't that sharp an image given the Canon 18-55 kit lens I was using I was intrigued by a comment made by somebody and wondered if it is correct or whether in fact I need not take any notice. The comment was that… -
Re: Bokeh
-
Re: Bokeh
cjmcch, Andy has a great thread about bokeh here The term Bokeh, refers to the aesthetic pleasing out of focus areas of an image. Webster's dictionary defines bokeh as "a Japanese term for the subjective aesthetic quality of out-of-focus areas of a photographic image" Wikipedia has a longer article here Bokeh refers to the… -
Re: Bokeh
My guess would be that in the same location a lens with a larger aperature (a 2.8, 2.0, or 1.8) could produce "good bokeh", but your kit lens was limited in this exact situation given the distance of the closer bulbs to the first bulb. A different angle on the in focus bulb may have produced the desire bokeh. -
Re: Bokeh
-
Re: Bokeh
Bokeh is so sujective to each person. Pesonally I would have angled the shot to not have the other flowers in the backround. Being they are on a white backround and, will become defined because, of the contrast in the colors. You will notice that the green and, yeallow lower area has a greater bokeh. Just a suggestion for… -
Re: Bokeh
10 results