Search
-
Re: Sigma 10-20 F3.5 VS Tokina 11-20 F2.8
-
Re: Sigma 10-20 F3.5 VS Tokina 11-20 F2.8
I had the older Sigma 10-20 F4-5.6 so this may not translate directly, but the distortion at 10-11mm was so severe that it wasn't particularly useful until 12mm. Perhaps I had a bad copy, but if you're looking for adequate performance, indoors, at 10-11mm, be sure the updated model is better corrected or can be… -
Re: Sigma 10-20 F3.5 VS Tokina 11-20 F2.8
I've tested both the new 10-20 3.5 and the new 11-20 2.8. (In addition to the original 10-20 4.5-5.6 and the 11-16 2.8) Hands-down, get the 11-20 2.8. It's just that sharp. Wide open at 2.8 it's amazingly perfect well past the rule-of-thirds area, and stopped down it's flawlessly sharp right up to the very corners. It's… -
Sigma 10-20 F3.5 VS Tokina 11-20 F2.8
I currently have a Tokina 12-24 F4 but I need something slightly wider for a specific client's work (event planner and she wants the whole room in one shot). Just on the basic specs it's a toss up, the Sigma's wider FOV would be nice, but the Tokina's brighter aperture would let me take photos of more venues by hand since…
4 results