Search
-
Re: Advice please
-
Re: Advice please
-
Re: Advice please
-
Re: Advice please
The Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM may be generally considered better than the Sigma 50-500mm f/4-6.3 EX DG HSM, with the possibility of some sample variation for both. (There exist very good copies of the Sigma and very bad copies of the Canon.) For handheld photography, the IS feature of the Canon would make it a… -
Re: Advice please
No idea how this Sigma compares with the other Sigma long zooms, but I recently lent my 100 -400 to a fellow Canon snapper and he (almost immediately) said he could see the difference (better) IQ on the cam lcd compared with his Sigma (150 -500 iirc) He also said the Canon's AF was quicker etc. All I can say is he's now… -
Re: Advice please
-
Re: Advice please
-
Advice please
I have been using a Sigma 50 - 500 lens on my 7D for wildlife. I find it so heavy to use following health problems. I have also found it has its light problems forcing me to use a high ISO which results in noise. I was thinking about a Canon 100 - 400L IS F4.5 lens. Can anyone tell me if I am doing the correct thing by… -
Re: Advice please
Thanks Brett. My 100 - 400L IS has arrived and this is one fantastic lens. The AF is really fast with a very sharp zoom and the image quality hand held at 400 with IS is unbelievable, something I have never been used with the 50 - 500. Although it is quite heavy. I find it a light weight after using the 50 - 500. I have… -
Re: Advice please
The biggest difference between these two lenses is the IS capability of the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM plus it "will" accept a Canon 1.4x teleconverter. I don't recommend the teleconverter because you will lose autofocus through most of the zoom range with both of your camera bodies plus image sharpness falls off…
11 results