Search
-
Re: I have canon 70-200 2.8 L CONSIDERING f4 version
-
Re: I have canon 70-200 2.8 L CONSIDERING f4 version
The rear glass of the 24-105 is too close to the mount. The black rubber piece of the 2X extender cannot go in. It does not make sense to put an extender on the 24-105 as it is already 4X optical zoom. Or it was not designed to go with the Extensions. Here is the sample picture of the 24-105 with the Teleplus 2x extender.… -
Re: I have canon 70-200 2.8 L CONSIDERING f4 version
The 28-105 USM was marketed November of 1992 :). It's actually not a bad lens, good build quality, acceptable image quality. As with most lenses, it's better stopped down. That was total sarcasm from me... I got the 28-105 for a bargain anyway. That's the beauty of the older lenses: they're not popular, and people price… -
Re: I have canon 70-200 2.8 L CONSIDERING f4 version
The f/2.8 (and the blurred background and more light it gives you) is pretty much the only advantage of the f/2.8 version. The f4 is lighter and easier to carry. From what I've heard, image quality is about the same. So, if you're used to shooting portraits at f/5.6 or smaller, AND if you have plenty of light (enough that…
4 results