Search
-
Re: Help Baldy shoot for a 72x240-inch print
-
Re: Help Baldy shoot for a 72x240-inch print
So that's the way I shot the one you saw me post a day or two ago. I got 5 panos and posted the middle one. Two are lighter and two darker. But, in order to get it in a resonable amount of time, I have to shoot one row with a 400mm lens, instead of two rows with a 600 or maybe even 800, which cuts the resolution. We are… -
Re: Help Baldy shoot for a 72x240-inch print
In! :D Ivar, nice shot. This business of making it pixel-peeper-proof at 72x700 kinda sucks. :cry Daniel, really nice angle. Where were you? My 5D MKII arrives Friday morning, so I'm gonna start making more attempts. Here's a question of major import: If I shoot 1 row with a 400mm I get 5632 vertical pixels in 72 inches =… -
Re: Help Baldy shoot for a 72x240-inch print
If there are clouds and fog, do you really need 180 pixels per inch in your original image? You can uprez 78 ppi to ~ 160 with one of the programs like Genuine Fractals can't you? Your 78 ppi figure is original pixels straight from the camera. You can uprezz that in ACR substantially, and choose to output your jpgs into…
4 results