Search
-
Canon 24-105L Review
-
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
-
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
-
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
-
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
-
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
You own a 10-22. You own a 70-200. You're interested in either a 17-40 or a 24-105. Why buy the 17-40? Why sell the 10-22? Just add the 24-105 and you're covered from 10 to 200. The only gap you have is from 22-24 - not much of a gap at all. So again, why mess with the 17-40? It's a fine lens. But you don't need it. -
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
-
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
-
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
Sid's right. I love the 24-105 outdoors, but ..... For concerts, indoors in the dark, especially up close where focusing has less room for error, get the 24-70 f2.8 L, or the Tamron 28-75f2.8 Di, or the 50mm f1.4 or the 85mm f1.8 , yadda yadda yadda ..... Even if IS would let you capture the exposure, f4 will not let you… -
Re: Canon 24-105L Review
Sid, I just shoot pictures with lenses, I do not test them on an optical bench. dunno I tend to shoot the 24-105 L a half a stop down from its maximim aperture, rather than wide open, probably more out of habit from using poorer quality glass when I was younger than real need with the 24-105. I shot the 24-105 exclusively…
27 results