Search
-
Re: I have canon 70-200 2.8 L CONSIDERING f4 version
-
Re: I have canon 70-200 2.8 L CONSIDERING f4 version
The 28-105 USM was marketed November of 1992 :). It's actually not a bad lens, good build quality, acceptable image quality. As with most lenses, it's better stopped down. That was total sarcasm from me... I got the 28-105 for a bargain anyway. That's the beauty of the older lenses: they're not popular, and people price… -
Re: I have canon 70-200 2.8 L CONSIDERING f4 version
A Wealth of info... Ziggy, Thanks so much for your response. I'm going to have to stick with my lens for now if for no other reason than the cost of my filters already purchased... I am seriously considering the EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM Telephoto Zoom But boy would I love to put an extender on that puppy, one that… -
Re: I have canon 70-200 2.8 L CONSIDERING f4 version
Canon Extender 2x III ? So how about this next topic then: Extender 2x III has anyone used this? According to Canon - Note: This lens is only compatible with fixed focal length L-series lenses 135mm and over, as well as the EF 70-200/2.8L, EF 70-200/2.8L IS, EF 70-200/4L, and EF 100-400/4.5-5.6L Now what a stinker that… -
Re: I have canon 70-200 2.8 L CONSIDERING f4 version
Oh I got it... Oh I got your sarcasm buddyO... and was certain that lens was an antique....lol Yeah, I hate changing lenses... which is why I'm considering the 28-300L - My current prime is the 17-40mm f4 L... I love that dang lens. In the exif data of my images I find that I am constantly set between 34-36mm... the lens… -
Re: I have canon 70-200 2.8 L CONSIDERING f4 version
I had a guy that was shooting for me with the f4 on a 7D. It was a moto event so the subject was moving fast. I was very unimpressed with the IQ out of the f4 for action. I am sure a still subject is another matter. When I was sorting I could pick the images he shot with that lens out of his batch at a glance. His 100-400… -
Re: I have canon 70-200 2.8 L CONSIDERING f4 version
Thanks and ...how about this next topic? Extender 2x III Canondude & Zanotti, Thanks for your comments... While your offer to exchange lenses is a tempting one, I find it rather hard to give up one letter of the Alphabet ... it's The L word... or, letter... Now if you had a 24-105mm f4 L... we might have gotten on with it.… -
Re: I have canon 70-200 2.8 L CONSIDERING f4 version
The f/2.8 (and the blurred background and more light it gives you) is pretty much the only advantage of the f/2.8 version. The f4 is lighter and easier to carry. From what I've heard, image quality is about the same. So, if you're used to shooting portraits at f/5.6 or smaller, AND if you have plenty of light (enough that…
8 results