Search
-
Re: Canon 28 - 300mm f/3.5-5.6
-
Re: Canon 28 - 300mm f/3.5-5.6
-
Re: Canon 28 - 300mm f/3.5-5.6
-
Re: Canon 28 - 300mm f/3.5-5.6
-
Re: Canon 28 - 300mm f/3.5-5.6
Just to give myself some reasons to consider the lens: 1. The weight - the 3.7 lbs is consider reasonable. The 70-200F2.8 IS is already 3.2 lbs and the 24 -105 F4 is 13 oz (almost a pound). The 28-300 covers more than that 2 lenses and weight totally 4 lbs. I can save 0.3 lbs. 2. The price is US 2188 for 28 -300. The… -
Re: Canon 28 - 300mm f/3.5-5.6
Unfortunately the only problem for me is the expense! The Canon 28-300 weighs 3.7 lbs which is only a little more than my Sigma 80-400 that weighs in at 3.6 lbs. I've carried the Sigma around all day (well till the sun starts to go down then it goes back in the bag!) with no problems. But with one child entering college… -
Canon 28 - 300mm f/3.5-5.6
I'm thinking of making the investment in this lens. Yikes! I find that my current telephoto (Tamron) doesn't have the crispness or the speed that my other Canon lenses have and so I'm thinking of ponying up some serious $$ for the lens. I have some trips coming up this year and I don't want to come back and be disappointed… -
Re: Canon 28 - 300mm f/3.5-5.6
Weighty and White I have a case full of L glass and I did not want to travel with it - by the end of a trip I get weary of carrying three lenses. I also don't want to shoot with a big whilte lense and call attention to myself all the time and yet I want to have a range of focal lengths. When I was shooting with my 20d, I…
8 results