Search
-
Help me spend some money.
Shooting with the 5dmrk ii I'm looking at either the 16-35mm 2.8 35mm 1.4 I've had the chance to borrow at 35 and loved it... but have always had a secret crush on the 16-35, and now, I'm faced with making a decision... How much distortion occurs on a full frame at 16mm? Is it true that, if I keep the shooting range from… -
Re: Help me spend some money.
The 17-40 is just about the same as the 16-35 when it comes to image quality. Many of the best landscape shots I've seen have come from a 17-40. I would recommend it for most purposes over the 16-35, simply because it's cheaper; the advantages of the 16-35 are mainly that it's better in low light (f/2.8), and that extra… -
Re: Help me spend some money.
-
Re: Help me spend some money.
-
Re: Help me spend some money.
-
Re: Help me spend some money.
Well, mostly because of the large f/1.4 aperture. I'd love to have that as a walkaround/landscape lens (though for landscapes you'd probably want *something* wider, even if it's a 20mm 2.8 or other "cheap" lens). The 16-35 has the f/2.8, which is fast, but the 35 1.4 lets in 4x as much light. Plus, I'm not sure but I think… -
Re: Help me spend some money.
7 results