Newbie question: What makes a quality high end lens?
robscomputer
Registered Users Posts: 326 Major grins
Hi,
I'm still new to the high end lens and wanted to know what really makes a Canon L lens high quality. I have heard they have better dust seals for professional use, also higher quality coatings on the glass. Anything else I am missing? I also read they weigh much more than regular lens, is there more elements in a L lens?
What brought up this is my friend picked up a Nikon lens, I think 17-35 f/2.8 that is very heavy and big, I think with a 77mm filter? The lens is about twice as heavy as the regular 17-35 zoom and wonder how they differ in construction.
Guess i'm trying to justify spending money on them when the time comes.
Thanks,
Rob
I'm still new to the high end lens and wanted to know what really makes a Canon L lens high quality. I have heard they have better dust seals for professional use, also higher quality coatings on the glass. Anything else I am missing? I also read they weigh much more than regular lens, is there more elements in a L lens?
What brought up this is my friend picked up a Nikon lens, I think 17-35 f/2.8 that is very heavy and big, I think with a 77mm filter? The lens is about twice as heavy as the regular 17-35 zoom and wonder how they differ in construction.
Guess i'm trying to justify spending money on them when the time comes.
Thanks,
Rob
Enjoying photography since 1980.
0
Comments
Relative to non-L Canon lenses, the L's have
- Ultra-low Dispersion (UD) glass and/or Flourite elements
- more rugged, sealed construction
- generally larger apertures
- a pretty red ring around the barrel
The reason that L's are generally heavier than non-L's of similar focal lengths is partly because of the more rugged construction, but probably mostly due to the larger apertures. An f/2.8 lens lets in twice as much light as an f/4, which doesn't necessarily mean twice as much glass, but it definitely means more glass, and consequently more weight.Note again that the differences mentioned above are relative to non-L Canon lenses. Other manufacturers produce lenses with similar (more or less) specifications, usually at a lower cost--whether the L's are worth the premium is often the subject of much debate. There is no question, however, that the L lenses are at the top of their class. If cost is no object, you can't go wrong with an L lens; if you're on a budget, you might get more bang for your buck with one of the alternatives.
Cheers,
Jeremy
Jeremy Rosenberger
Zeiss Ikon, Nokton 40mm f/1.4, Canon 50mm f/1.2, Nokton 50mm f/1.5, Canon Serenar 85mm f/2
Canon Digital Rebel XT, Tokina 12-24mm f/4, Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm f/1.4, Canon 50mm f/1.4
http://ubergeek.smugmug.com/
I tested out a few lens in the shops and the more expensive glass always impressed me with the focus speed. When photographing a motorcycle race I was having so many problems with my 100-300mm f/5.6 lens not keeping up with the motorcycles. Kept thinking my EOS 3 was not focusing correctly or the AI servo was having a problem. It was so bad I had to keep the focusing on single and then lock onto a point where the motorcycle would travel over.
Then I talked about this to a local shop and they let me test out the 70-200mm IR, it was a huge improvement in focus speed!
Thanks again,
Rob
Ahh yes, there's also the focus speed. I believe all (or almost all) Canon L's have the USM focus motor, offering some of the fastest focusing around. But some non-L's have USM as well, so it's not exclusive to the top-tier lenses. Sigma also offers a similar technology, which goes by the name HSM, in some of their lenses. (So far I think Sigma is the only third-party lens manufacturer that offers such technology.) Finally, it's worth noting that there are some reasonably fast-focusing non-USM lenses out there, but all else being equal, a USM lens will focus faster than a non-USM one.
Cheers,
Jeremy
Jeremy Rosenberger
Zeiss Ikon, Nokton 40mm f/1.4, Canon 50mm f/1.2, Nokton 50mm f/1.5, Canon Serenar 85mm f/2
Canon Digital Rebel XT, Tokina 12-24mm f/4, Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm f/1.4, Canon 50mm f/1.4
http://ubergeek.smugmug.com/
It does need a lot of light though. If it doesn't get it, the focusing hunts forever.
Interestingly the 24mm T&S is an L lens, but the 45mm T&S and 90mm T&S are not.
http://consumer.usa.canon.com/ir/controller?act=CanonAdvantageCatIndexAct&fcategoryid=156
Lots of interesting information here about Canon lens construction and what goes into their L lenses. Makes me appreciate them even more. :
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin