The Gasmen of Ireland

dadwtwinsdadwtwins Registered Users Posts: 804 Major grins
edited August 2, 2008 in People
Recently I pushed my camera to the limit trying to shot in an Irish Pub called the "Plough and the Stars" in San Francisco. A friend of mine wanted some casual pictures taken of some of the members of a Celtic group called "The Gasmen"

Unfortunately I was not allowed to use a flash or even fixed lighting. I had to use available light and if anyone patronizes pubs knows, light is not that available :scratch. Very particular these lads were, they did not want to be distracted by bright lights or flashes. My fastest lens is a f2.8 but supposedly the D3 takes decent pics at ISO 6400. This ISO setting is unheard of when i had my D200 or even when I was shooting film.

The following results were noisy but it seemed to add to the atmosphere. All be it, these pictures will not win any contests but I wanted to share my experiences shooting at the ridiculous ISO setting of 6400.

This particular pub has the atmosphere and the patrons of a typical Irish pub. I was the only one in the place that spoke with an American accent and the Guinness is almost as good as from the home land.

342111828_884wP-M-2.jpg

Members of the Gasmen Group

John
342110333_pNDD2-M-2.jpg

Kenny
342110898_s8kv3-M-2.jpg

Vincy
342114529_Q8Cd4-M-1.jpg

One of the great things of a true Irish pub is that when someone wants to join in with the band, they are welcomed warmly. Even other musicians jumped in to play the classic Celtic folk music. Most of it talking about fighting of the Brits, death or broken hearts. Hmmm..except for hating the britd, it almost sounds like American country:huh

342112646_yBuAg-M-2.jpg

342108854_tMYS2-M-2.jpg

With Celtic music, there is always someone dancing. Even in a crowded pub, people still get up and move to their favorite song.

342134660_AYjXD-M.jpg

342109316_KsxQb-M-2.jpg

Finally, this wouldn't be a true Irish pub without the characters that make-up the pubs patrons.

342111128_7tLrJ-M-2.jpg

342111502_tRHGZ-M-2.jpg

342115983_a7wXc-M-2.jpg

342109553_FoXAg-M-2.jpg

342110075_qXeNC-M-2.jpg

Well, there you have it. A few shots taken at ISO 6400 in horrible light conditions but at a Pub that was full of great characters that made my shooting experience a pure joy. It was a great reminder of why I love Ireland. It is not the countries land that I enjoyed the most but the down to earth, terribly kind and generous people that make up Ireland:lust
My Homepage :thumb-->http://dthorp.smugmug.com
My Photo Blog -->http://dthorpphoto.blogspot.com/

Comments

  • JulieLawsonPhotographyJulieLawsonPhotography Registered Users Posts: 787 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2008
    Very nice story to go along with wonderful pictures. I couldn't imagine shooting at such a high ISO, but I agree that it really adds to the images as does the black and white. Lovely shots!
  • RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,955 moderator
    edited July 31, 2008
    Nice set. I don't think high ISO noise matters much for pub shots as long as you get the exposure right. That's out on Clement St., right? I'm pretty sure I crawled through there once or twice when I lived in SF. Nice to see that it hasn't turned into a Starbucks.
  • DonRicklinDonRicklin Registered Users Posts: 5,551 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2008
    And here I was thinking you we going to show workers that still go around and light Gas Streelights! Instead it's a bunch of 'old pharts' playing music!rolleyes1.gif

    :D

    I sure it was a great listen, as well as shooting!clap.gifclapclap.gif

    Don
    Don Ricklin - Gear: Canon EOS 5D Mark III, was Pentax K7
    'I was older then, I'm younger than that now' ....
    My Blog | Q+ | Moderator, Lightroom Forums | My Amateur Smugmug Stuff | My Blurb book Rust and Whimsy. More Rust , FaceBook
    .
  • dadwtwinsdadwtwins Registered Users Posts: 804 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2008
    Richard wrote:
    Nice set. I don't think high ISO noise matters much for pub shots as long as you get the exposure right. That's out on Clement St., right? I'm pretty sure I crawled through there once or twice when I lived in SF. Nice to see that it hasn't turned into a Starbucks.

    Spot on Richard, Clement & 2ndthumb.gif
    DonRicklin wrote:
    Hand here I was htinking you we going to show workers that still go around and light Gas Streelights! Instead it's a bunch of 'old pharts' playing music!rolleyes1.gif

    :D

    I sure it was a great listen, as well as shooting!clap.gifclapclap.gif

    Don

    rolleyes1.gif, that would make for a great pictureclap.gif
    Very nice story to go along with wonderful pictures. I couldn't imagine shooting at such a high ISO, but I agree that it really adds to the images as does the black and white. Lovely shots!

    thank you Julie
    My Homepage :thumb-->http://dthorp.smugmug.com
    My Photo Blog -->http://dthorpphoto.blogspot.com/
  • NeilLNeilL Registered Users Posts: 4,201 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2008
    I like these very much, dwt. Fine performance from photographer and camera (was a great deal of NR necessary, or did you do none?).

    Neil
    "Snow. Ice. Slow!" "Half-winter. Half-moon. Half-asleep!"

    http://www.behance.net/brosepix
  • dadwtwinsdadwtwins Registered Users Posts: 804 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2008
    NeilL wrote:
    I like these very much, dwt. Fine performance from photographer and camera (was a great deal of NR necessary, or did you do none?).

    Neil

    I did not use a third party NR like my fav noise ninja but when I converted the color picture to B&W I did reduce the blue channel and upped the yellow which does reduce the noise. The noise in the color photos were very noticeableheadscratch.gif.

    I will post one of the unprocessed pics when i get home from work for comparison.thumb.gif
    My Homepage :thumb-->http://dthorp.smugmug.com
    My Photo Blog -->http://dthorpphoto.blogspot.com/
  • NeilLNeilL Registered Users Posts: 4,201 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2008
    dadwtwins wrote:
    I did not use a third party NR like my fav noise ninja but when I converted the color picture to B&W I did reduce the blue channel and upped the yellow which does reduce the noise. The noise in the color photos were very noticeableheadscratch.gif.

    I will post one of the unprocessed pics when i get home from work for comparison.thumb.gif

    Thanks. dwt. Interesting way to treat noise. Anyway, as I said, you got a fine result here!

    Neil
    "Snow. Ice. Slow!" "Half-winter. Half-moon. Half-asleep!"

    http://www.behance.net/brosepix
  • dlplumerdlplumer Registered Users Posts: 8,081 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2008
    These are great with no noise visible to my eye. Maybe if you showed us large images we would see the noise. Great story clap.gif
  • dadwtwinsdadwtwins Registered Users Posts: 804 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2008
    Ok, here is an example of a before and after processing. As you can see the color picture noise level is much more obvious. B&W is your friend when it comes to hiding any anomalies:D. Color pictures just highlight any non-purposeful defects as destractions to the picture.

    2720369855_fb94e73d2d_b.jpg


    342767185_5Dkur-X2.jpg
    My Homepage :thumb-->http://dthorp.smugmug.com
    My Photo Blog -->http://dthorpphoto.blogspot.com/
  • jeffreaux2jeffreaux2 Registered Users Posts: 4,762 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2008
    All the BW's are super nice and contrasty!!! Excellent!thumb.gif
  • NeilLNeilL Registered Users Posts: 4,201 Major grins
    edited August 1, 2008
    Thanks for the color sample, dwt. Very impressive result at ISO 6400 with so little light, from the camera and you!

    Could you please comment more on why you targeted the blue channel to treat noise? My understanding was our eyes are least sensitive to noise in the blue channel, and most to noise in the green. Also, you mention boosting the yellow channel. Were you in CMYK?

    Thanks.

    Neil
    "Snow. Ice. Slow!" "Half-winter. Half-moon. Half-asleep!"

    http://www.behance.net/brosepix
  • ladytxladytx Registered Users Posts: 814 Major grins
    edited August 1, 2008
    Great job under hard conditions. I really need help and guidance when it comes to low light. Want to be able to do it though. You did a great job.
    LadyTX
  • dadwtwinsdadwtwins Registered Users Posts: 804 Major grins
    edited August 2, 2008
    ladytx wrote:
    Great job under hard conditions. I really need help and guidance when it comes to low light. Want to be able to do it though. You did a great job.

    low light = expensive equipmentlol3.gif

    Using a high quality quick lens with an f-stop of f2.8 or greater will help gather available light paired with a high ISO setting, >800, on your camera is the first step.
    Second choose a lens 80mm or wider to be able to hand hold at slower shutter speeds. I can usually hold a 80mm f1.8 with shutter speeds of 1/30 with good results and not much effort. If you are able to use a flash, it will help greatly with stopping the unwanted motion blur.
    NeilL wrote:
    Thanks for the color sample, dwt. Very impressive result at ISO 6400 with so little light, from the camera and you!

    Could you please comment more on why you targeted the blue channel to treat noise? My understanding was our eyes are least sensitive to noise in the blue channel, and most to noise in the green. Also, you mention boosting the yellow channel. Were you in CMYK?

    Thanks.

    Neil

    Please forgive me Neil, I did not use the correct nomenclature nor explain my comments very well.ne_nau.gif

    In my post processing when converting colour to B&W, I use CS3's B&W filter on its own layer. In these particular pictures, the blues and reds were the noisiest (dark colors) so I moved the blue and red color sliders to the left while the yellows help smooth out the noise (light colors) by moving the yellow slider to the right.

    Here is an example of what I am trying to say:
    343545324_ayk28-L.jpg
    My Homepage :thumb-->http://dthorp.smugmug.com
    My Photo Blog -->http://dthorpphoto.blogspot.com/
  • ladytxladytx Registered Users Posts: 814 Major grins
    edited August 2, 2008
    low light = expensive equipmentlol3.gif

    Using a high quality quick lens with an f-stop of f2.8 or greater will help gather available light paired with a high ISO setting, >800, on your camera is the first step.
    Second choose a lens 80mm or wider to be able to hand hold at slower shutter speeds. I can usually hold a 80mm f1.8 with shutter speeds of 1/30 with good results and not much effort. If you are able to use a flash, it will help greatly with stopping the unwanted motion blur.

    Thanks for the explanation. I have a 50mm 1.7 and a 28mm 2.8. I will try my hand with those.
    LadyTX
  • NeilLNeilL Registered Users Posts: 4,201 Major grins
    edited August 2, 2008
    Gotcha! Thanks for the info, very nice! thumb.gif

    Neil
    "Snow. Ice. Slow!" "Half-winter. Half-moon. Half-asleep!"

    http://www.behance.net/brosepix
Sign In or Register to comment.