Rugby exhibition

South Shore SnapshotsSouth Shore Snapshots Registered Users Posts: 140 Major grins
edited August 6, 2008 in Sports
Had a beer and watched the games for a bit yesterday afternoon. Grabbed a few action shots while I was at it. All K10D with FA*200mm and manual focus - not sure why, but I think the heat was a little too much for my AF system - seems back to good now.

343911574_tjfBK-L.jpg

343913136_3huLQ-L.jpg

343914055_9x4Sj-L.jpg

Thanks for looking,

Rob
Nikon D90 | MB-D80 GRIP | 80-200mm F2.8 | 50mm F1.8 | Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 | SB 400

Pentax K1000 | M28mm F2.8 | M50mm F2 | Takumar Bayonet 135mm F2.5

www.southshoresnapshots.smugmug.com

Comments

  • tinfishtinfish Registered Users Posts: 50 Big grins
    edited August 4, 2008
    Nice shots. I wish there was someplace I could go to sit and have a beer while watching a live rugby match. Probably not anytime in the near future here in Amarillo Texas.
    Jeff Harbin
    "Life of Riley" Photography
    www.lifeofrileyphotography.com
  • johngjohng Registered Users Posts: 1,658 Major grins
    edited August 4, 2008
    All 3 would benefit greatly from much tighter framing. But don't confuse that with 'cropping'. If these were taken with a 200mm prime I would suggest you wait until the action gets a bit closer. As a general guideline you want your subject filling at least 2/3 of the portrait-oriented frame. It's a guideline not a rule. But you'll see a huge improvement in focus, sharpness and detail. If you're going to be shooting a lot of rugby I would recommend a longer lens.
  • tanyBUGtanyBUG Registered Users Posts: 35 Big grins
    edited August 4, 2008
    great shots, i really like that last one!
    rugby is so hardcore!
  • wingerwinger Registered Users Posts: 694 Major grins
    edited August 6, 2008
    johng wrote:
    All 3 would benefit greatly from much tighter framing. But don't confuse that with 'cropping'. If these were taken with a 200mm prime I would suggest you wait until the action gets a bit closer. As a general guideline you want your subject filling at least 2/3 of the portrait-oriented frame. It's a guideline not a rule. But you'll see a huge improvement in focus, sharpness and detail. If you're going to be shooting a lot of rugby I would recommend a longer lens.

    I was going to say the same thing.
  • South Shore SnapshotsSouth Shore Snapshots Registered Users Posts: 140 Major grins
    edited August 6, 2008
    Thanks everyone for the critique. Indeed, it seemed as though the play was mostly on the far side. Having a 300mm lens would be a real benefit in such instances - but that additional $ escapes me at this point in time. Thanks again.

    Rob
    Nikon D90 | MB-D80 GRIP | 80-200mm F2.8 | 50mm F1.8 | Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 | SB 400

    Pentax K1000 | M28mm F2.8 | M50mm F2 | Takumar Bayonet 135mm F2.5

    www.southshoresnapshots.smugmug.com
Sign In or Register to comment.