A little bit revealing...

cmorganphotography

This is from a shoot from a Salvage Shop with a model named Jenna. That's not the point though.

Please go and vote for the contest participants!

Vote for your favourite!

here: http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=102471

darkdragon

First: I like this shot. I love the color/darkness of it all

Second: Yeah, people need to vote for the winners!

cmorganphotography

Thank you. That's a nice *big link* you there in that there then signature of yours.

darkdragon

cmorganphotography wrote:

Thank you. That's a nice *big link* you there in that there then signature of yours.

Thanks, I agree. I do that for voting rounds when i remember, then remove it after the voting is closed.

I have no idea if it helps get people to vote or realize there is a vote going on, but hopefully it doesn't hurt (much).

Oceanlights

I must say, every photo must speak itself and this one really speaks her feeling. I loved the photo very much.

Thanks for sharing it.

Art Scott

Ahhhhhh I see the a little bit revealing was to draw in the lech's of the group hoping to see something....when infact you were just wanting people to vote forthe challenge finalists....:D

I already did that.....I (one of the lech's of the group) came for the bit of revealing and was not disappointed at all.....a really great photo!!thumb

I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT WITH ALL OF THE MEMBERS OF THIS FORUM THERE HAVE ONLY BEEN A BIT OVER 150 VOTERS.....WHERE IS THE COMMUNITY SPIRIT................. PEOOOOOOOOPLE!!!!

cOME ON VOTE...DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU ENTERED OR NOT.....LOOK WITH YOUR EAGLE EYE AND SCRUTINIZE THE WORK OF EACH ARTIST AND VOTE!!!!!!!!!

cmorganphotography

Oceanlights wrote:

I must say...Thanks for sharing it.

Thank you. I thought I'd post a people pic but I really just want people to vote. Don't vote for mine though unless you think it's the best but there are wayyyyyyy better entries.

cmorganphotography

Art Scott wrote:

Ahhhhhh I see the a little bit revealing..a really great photo!!thumb

Well, if it works... thanks for the compliment. It's straight from the cam after conversion to jpg. Everybody would click on something for the chance to leer/scoff at nudity. It's one of those morbid fascinations?

dlplumer

cmorganphotography wrote:

This is from a shoot from a Salvage Shop with a model named Jenna. That's not the point though.

Please go and vote for the contest participants!

Vote for your favourite!

here: http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=102471

I thought this was a self portrait?

cmorganphotography

dlplumer wrote:

I thought this was a self portrait?

Oh no. I don't look anything like her. I thought I'd get the people form people in on some voting since you got the wildlife people. I think some of them have voted, there's a few more votes.

NeilL

cmorganphotography wrote:

Well, if it works... thanks for the compliment. It's straight from the cam after conversion to jpg. Everybody would click on something for the chance to leer/scoff at nudity. It's one of those morbid fascinations?

Oo, cmor! A little bit offensive, I would have thought. There is use and there is misuse. How can you buy into misuse to attract attention, and then condemn.

The body is the temple of the soul, I remember from somewhere? But I would say, rather, that the soul is the body's reflection. Our souls are what we consciously know, and we can know so little. Our bodies are seen in that glass, darkly. We are fascinated by the body because the real mystery is there. Hardly deserving of relegation to the gutter?

I do like this photo, though a little morbid, I think, self-conscious. I first saw it elsewhere. I also like your current entry, and don't, for the same reasons.

If people don't vote, they have their reasons, don't you think? I can think of some. Why wish them to run in a herd like cattle?

Nothing wrong with your intentions, though, if I may say so.

Neil

pyrtek

cmorganphotography wrote:

Everybody would click on something for the chance to leer/scoff at nudity.

That's not only insulting, it's simply absurd. You can't possibly know everybody's
intentions and you can't possibly be serious in thinking that people only "leer" or "scoff"
at nudity.

cmorganphotography wrote:

It's one of those morbid fascinations?

You think an interest in nudity is "morbid"? Wow.


No, really, wow.

cmorganphotography

pyrtek wrote:

That's not only insulting, it's simply absurd. You can't possibly know everybody's
intentions and you can't possibly be serious in thinking that people only "leer" or "scoff"
at nudity.



You think an interest in nudity is "morbid"? Wow.


No, really, wow.

You are perfectly welcome to your opinion while also reminding me why I lessened my usage of these forums. Art Scott called you all, and himself, "lech[es]" and yet you demean my words. It was all a lighthearted poke, a jest. From both of us.
And yes, people leer and scoff and stare blankly and find offense where none is meant. People are pretty great as well as diverse and glorious.
Really, let's keep arguing opinions, though.

cmorganphotography

NeilL wrote:

Oo, cmor! A little bit offensive, I would have thought. There is use and there is misuse. How can you buy into misuse to attract attention, and then condemn.
If people don't vote, they have their reasons, don't you think? I can think of some. Why wish them to run in a herd like cattle?
Nothing wrong with your intentions, though, if I may say so.
Neil

I'm not the first to use this tactic, especially in this forum. Second, people are free to do as they please, vote and not vote. I just wanted to help both the moderators in spreading the word. A couple of other contestants posted on other forums that they frequent a lot and I thought I'd be helpful with the same. It's funny, you and the poster below you said the same thing but in two separate ways.

pyrtek

cmorganphotography wrote:

People are pretty great as well as diverse and glorious.

It's ironic that you say people are diverse, yet you had the gall to sum
everybody up in your inane comment above. But that's OK, I like
irony. It amuses me.

cmorganphotography wrote:

Really, let's keep arguing opinions, though.

I was reacting to an insult, not an opinion.

NeilL

cmorganphotography wrote:

You are perfectly welcome to your opinion while also reminding me why I lessened my usage of these forums. Art Scott called you all, and himself, "lech[es]" and yet you demean my words. It was all a lighthearted poke, a jest. From both of us.
And yes, people leer and scoff and stare blankly and find offense where none is meant. People are pretty great as well as diverse and glorious.
Really, let's keep arguing opinions, though.

And it's certainly very, very stale news for someone to say something in these forums and then when someone reacts hasten to dissimulate with "I was only joking. Are you so dumb? Doh!" Well, being dumb is a distinct possibility for me, but being that naive? No.

Furthermore, I know you are not the kind of gal who says something without meaning something, come on. I hang on your every word.

I did acknowledge your good intentions!

I'm being free, as you say I am, and I would like to believe!

Neil

Richard

This thread has gone off into the weeds, folks. No more sniping or I start deleting posts. Back to photography, please.

Art Scott

Richard wrote:

This thread has gone off into the weeds, folks. No more sniping or I start deleting posts. Back to photography, please.

I agree...got way off topic.....it was just a fun poke at the op and she knew it.....

NOW GO VOTE ......IN THE CHALLENGE FORUM!!! TIME IS RUNNING OUT!!!

Halliday

dlplumer wrote:

I thought this was a self portrait?

Contact me if you would like an image of the thread starter looking like a Nikon-Superwoman emerging from a phone booth