Does My Lens Suck, Part II

chuckinsocalchuckinsocal Registered Users Posts: 932 Major grins
edited September 2, 2008 in Cameras
So, after a disappointing first test drive of my new D80 and 18-135 lens I thought it would be both fun and interesting to shoot a sobriety check point being conducted in my city on Saturday night. Since I've never done any night shooting, I did my best to remember what I've read here and kind of made it all up as I went along. The lighting was horrible with regular street lights, flood lights set up for the operation, head lights, and tail lights all conflicting with each other. I wound up shooting with ISO at 1600 and aperture wide open. The camera did a pretty good job with the light the main problem being that the shutter speed was sometimes too slow to avoid camera shake blurring. A tripod would have helped but it would have been too clumsy, awkward and slow in this situation. The only pp I did on these were to bring out some shadows and kill some harsh highlights.

A few of the photos are below and the rest can be seen in this gallery.

363011481_gE6uH-M.jpg

363011551_7J3Re-M.jpg

363011910_QDeWb-M.jpg

363012059_v8gtU-M.jpg

363013031_RQtom-M.jpg

Comments are welcome and appreciated.
Chuck Cannova
www.socalimages.com

Artistically & Creatively Challenged

Comments

  • BrascoleBrascole Registered Users Posts: 58 Big grins
    edited September 1, 2008
    So, after a disappointing first test drive of my new D80 and 18-135 lens I thought it would be both fun and interesting to shoot a sobriety check point being conducted in my city on Saturday night. Since I've never done any night shooting, I did my best to remember what I've read here and kind of made it all up as I went along. The lighting was horrible with regular street lights, flood lights set up for the operation, head lights, and tail lights all conflicting with each other. I wound up shooting with ISO at 1600 and aperture wide open. The camera did a pretty good job with the light the main problem being that the shutter speed was sometimes too slow to avoid camera shake blurring. A tripod would have helped but it would have been too clumsy, awkward and slow in this situation. The only pp I did on these were to bring out some shadows and kill some harsh highlights.

    A few of the photos are below and the rest can be seen in this gallery.

    363011481_gE6uH-M.jpg

    363011551_7J3Re-M.jpg

    363011910_QDeWb-M.jpg

    363012059_v8gtU-M.jpg

    363013031_RQtom-M.jpg

    Comments are welcome and appreciated.


    The police look at ease with your taking pictures of them. I gotta guess your a cop. In any event like the action it's was like reading a book. Some of the photos are a bit oof. Put a monopod in the trunk.
  • davidweaverdavidweaver Registered Users Posts: 681 Major grins
    edited September 2, 2008
    Can you provide EXIF info in the gallery? My eyes say you have a couple stops of light you could give up for shutter speed in many of the pics.

    Cheers,
    David
  • chuckinsocalchuckinsocal Registered Users Posts: 932 Major grins
    edited September 2, 2008
    OK ... the PhotoBar is back on for now ... I guess I gotta go out and buy a decent monopod for the next time.

    I think I shot in P mode with the ISO set to 1600. The camera was opening the aperture wide and giving me shutter speeds as low as 1/25 or so.
    Chuck Cannova
    www.socalimages.com

    Artistically & Creatively Challenged
  • chuckinsocalchuckinsocal Registered Users Posts: 932 Major grins
    edited September 2, 2008
    No, I'm not a cop. I guess it has to do with taking photos of things in plain view from a public street. It doesn't hurt though that I have been a fan and supporter of my local PD for many years and I'm well known and respected by many of the officers. They were fine with it as long as I stayed safe and didn't get in the way or interfere in any way. Besides, they have nothing to hide.
    Chuck Cannova
    www.socalimages.com

    Artistically & Creatively Challenged
  • chuckinsocalchuckinsocal Registered Users Posts: 932 Major grins
    edited September 2, 2008
    Thanks Seymore ... actually it helps a lot and I appreciate the time you took with it. I still have a lot to learn and every shoot is a learning experience.
    Chuck Cannova
    www.socalimages.com

    Artistically & Creatively Challenged
  • BrascoleBrascole Registered Users Posts: 58 Big grins
    edited September 2, 2008
    No, I'm not a cop. I guess it has to do with taking photos of things in plain view from a public street. It doesn't hurt though that I have been a fan and supporter of my local PD for many years and I'm well known and respected by many of the officers. They were fine with it as long as I stayed safe and didn't get in the way or interfere in any way. Besides, they have nothing to hide.


    So do I. They do a professional job as seen in you photo's. I followed a drunk driver, not to long ago. I was on my cell giving 911 a street by street, turn by turn, the operator just told me to be careful and was ok with what I was doing. The guy was so drunk he didn't notice me and I was able to follow him to the place he was going. I waited and a female cop drove up and said thanks then walked over to the car and do I have to paint a picture. I left but felt good about stopping a creep from potentially killing someone.clap.gif
Sign In or Register to comment.