Input sought on switching to LR2 from ACR

rockcanyonphotosrockcanyonphotos Registered Users Posts: 117 Major grins
edited September 2, 2008 in Finishing School
I currently use Adobe Camera RAW in CS3 bridge for PP work. Tired the original LR and while it was good my flow was just faster in Camera RAW. For those of you that have been using LR2.... is it worth the switch?? have they set it up so you don't have to bounce back and forth to the "development" module?

regards, Kevin
www.rockcanyonphotos.com

Canon 1DM4, 300mm 2.8, 70-200mm 2.8, 200mm 1.8, 24-70mm 2.8, 85mm 1.8

Comments

  • AnthonyAnthony Registered Users Posts: 149 Major grins
    edited September 2, 2008
    rockcanyonphotos wrote:
    I currently use Adobe Camera RAW in CS3 bridge for PP work. Tired the original LR and while it was good my flow was just faster in Camera RAW. For those of you that have been using LR2.... is it worth the switch?? have they set it up so you don't have to bounce back and forth to the "development" module?

    regards, Kevin

    In workflow terms it is fundamentally the same.

    Anthony.
  • pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,708 moderator
    edited September 2, 2008
    I have much more affection for LR2 than I did for LR also. I, previously, used PSCS3 and ACR only.

    I find it easy to take an image in LR2, and go to Photo >Edit in PSCS3 - simple, fast, easy.

    When I save the image as a jpg from Photoshop, the new jpg shows up in LR2 without further ado.
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Sign In or Register to comment.