Prime discussion
swintonphoto
Registered Users Posts: 1,664 Major grins
I was an avid prime user when I used film, but have shifted to rely more on zooms in recent years. I love the flexibility of quickly adjusting my perspective until I find just the right perspective for my shot. My opinion is that zoom lens optics have improved significantly. However, I still think there is always a place for great primes. I have considered investing in more, but, now that I am use to using zooms, I am not sure they would get the use they did historically for me.
Just wondering what people's thoughts are regarding the use of primes vs. zooms?
Just wondering what people's thoughts are regarding the use of primes vs. zooms?
0
Comments
In wedding and event stuff the only time I use a prime is when I need a very fast aperture, as in the 50mm, f1.4. If flash is not allowed during the ceremony, the case in all of the churches I shoot at, the fast aperture is worth everything (if it includes accurate focus.)
Yes, I'm old enough to remember when zoom lenses really weren't that great. The top-tier zooms today are really fantastic by comparison and I don't feel I'm giving up as much when I do use a zoom.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
WHOLE HEARTEDLY.....or is the hole heartedly.......hmmmm....Nope it is the first one......stop it....do not answer yourself...OR they'll be coming to take me away ha ha...coming to take me awaaaaaaayyyyyyyy....:D
wartime environment, Lowy's zoom lenses
did not. "In Iraq, I was just getting tons
of crap into the zoom mechanism," he says.
So, in July, he shelved his 17-35 and
bought a Nikkor AF 14mm f/2.8D ED, a
Nikkor AF 20mm f/2.8D, and a Nikkor AF
85mm f/1.4D IF. "I do not use zoom lenses
anymore," Lowy says, though he
acknowledged later that he still employs
the 80-200mm if absolutely necessary."
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-6456-7033