Current rec's for a back-up compact camera?

TeddifishTeddifish Registered Users Posts: 26 Big grins
edited September 18, 2008 in Cameras
Hello everyone,

I mostly lurk here, but wanted to ask what the current favorites are for back-up cameras--the small ones that most of us tuck into a purse or a pocket for catching those unexpected shots. There are so many choices out there--I'm at a loss to choose one. Any suggestions (especially with your reasons) are welcome. Thanks!
~Teddi
Sony A200, 20mm F2.8; 35 - 70 F4; 50mm F1.7; 28-135 F4; 24-70 f2.8z (and a backache)

Comments

  • Scott_QuierScott_Quier Registered Users Posts: 6,524 Major grins
    edited September 16, 2008
    I like the Canon G9
    • Decent to good optics
    • RAW (CR2)
    • Av, Tv, Manual modes
    • Compatible with my other Canon gear (580EX, PocketWizards, etc)
    • For a P&S, it does a decent job controling noise. ISO 80 - 400 is all quite usable.
    • 1/500 x-sync speed when using Canon flash. Can boost that to 1/2000 when using non-dedicated flash.
    • Reasonably small - not quite shirt-pocket small, but still small enough. Can certainly fit in a lady's purse.
    • It's black
    Scott
    My Photos
    Thoughts on photographing a wedding, How to post a picture, AF Microadjustments?, Light Scoop
    Equipment List - Check my profile
  • TeddifishTeddifish Registered Users Posts: 26 Big grins
    edited September 16, 2008
    Scott_Quier wrote:
    I like the Canon G9
    • Decent to good optics
    • RAW (CR2)
    • Av, Tv, Manual modes
    • Compatible with my other Canon gear (580EX, PocketWizards, etc)
    • For a P&S, it does a decent job controling noise. ISO 80 - 400 is all quite usable.
    • 1/500 x-sync speed when using Canon flash. Can boost that to 1/2000 when using non-dedicated flash.
    • Reasonably small - not quite shirt-pocket small, but still small enough. Can certainly fit in a lady's purse.
    • It's black

    Thanks Scott!
    Sony A200, 20mm F2.8; 35 - 70 F4; 50mm F1.7; 28-135 F4; 24-70 f2.8z (and a backache)
  • swintonphotoswintonphoto Registered Users Posts: 1,664 Major grins
    edited September 16, 2008
    How about one of the new micro-fourthirds cameras? Panasonic announced theirs, Olympus is supposed to announce one this week. You wont beat the quality in a compact.
    Jonathan
    http://www.jonathanswinton.com
    http://www.swintoncounseling.com
  • TeddifishTeddifish Registered Users Posts: 26 Big grins
    edited September 16, 2008
    swintonphoto wrote:
    How about one of the new micro-fourthirds cameras? Panasonic announced theirs, Olympus is supposed to announce one this week. You wont beat the quality in a compact.

    Thank you!

    I have been reading about those, but haven't had the chance to try one. Does anyone have a field report?
    Sony A200, 20mm F2.8; 35 - 70 F4; 50mm F1.7; 28-135 F4; 24-70 f2.8z (and a backache)
  • gtcgtc Registered Users Posts: 916 Major grins
    edited September 16, 2008
    pocketable
    size is the issue for me- its either the full pack and tripod or something that is small and also unobtrusive.

    How abot an olympus XA for $50 and a roll of good film or the later olympus mju? pocketable also means it will get more use.
    Latitude: 37° 52'South
    Longitude: 145° 08'East

    Canon 20d,EFS-60mm Macro,Canon 85mm/1.8. Pentax Spotmatic SP,Pentax Super Takumars 50/1.4 &135/3.5,Pentax Super-Multi-Coated Takumars 200/4 ,300/4,400/5.6,Sigma 600/8.
  • TeddifishTeddifish Registered Users Posts: 26 Big grins
    edited September 16, 2008
    gtc wrote:
    size is the issue for me- its either the full pack and tripod or something that is small and also unobtrusive.

    How abot an olympus XA for $50 and a roll of good film or the later olympus mju? pocketable also means it will get more use.

    I hadn't even thought about an Olympus. Thanks Greg!
    Sony A200, 20mm F2.8; 35 - 70 F4; 50mm F1.7; 28-135 F4; 24-70 f2.8z (and a backache)
  • CatoCato Registered Users Posts: 287 Major grins
    edited September 18, 2008
    Teddifish wrote:
    Thank you!

    I have been reading about those, but haven't had the chance to try one. Does anyone have a field report?

    Not a field report, but according to the specs - at least for the Panny 4/3 - it's size is more like a smallish DSLR, rather than a P&S. Definitely no pocket size.

    Canon A650 has the same sensor and lens as the G9, as well as manual controls. With the CHDK hack it can also shoot RAW.

    Panasonic recently intro'd the LX3, which has a 24-60mm (35mm equivalent) f/2-2.8 lens. It also has a fairly tame 10 mp on a large-ish 1/1.7" sensor.

    Sony's W300 has been getting good press regarding IQ, even in the higher-ISO range.
    http://catographer.smugmug.com/

    Shooter on a shoestring.
Sign In or Register to comment.