Soft Silhouette

wfeller

Darren Troy C

Would you PLEASE try something for me? I'm one of "those" people......you know, the kind that tend to always see something that's either not there or just weird. Here's my suggestion. Crop just below the last visible cloud and turn this into a semi-pano type shot. Then, amp your saturation a little bit and then lastly bump your contrast a tad as well. I have a feeling this part of your image would simply sing with these adjustments. (Hint - I tried it and it makes a FANTASTIC water color - surreal - dreamlike pano wall art!)


eeeewwwww, eeewwwwww, eewwwww can I post it.....can I....puuuhhhlllleeeeaaase ?????

Oh lord, I hope I don't have to go to the punishment corner for this. I'll take it down ASAP if told to do so!

Simply what I "saw" in your already wonderful image.

Dave Clee

Hmmm, unfortunately this particular shot doesnt do alot for me. I have looked at it a couple of times now and each time I come away with a puzzled feeling of why this would of made the keeper list

Cheers

Dave

wfeller

Idlewild wrote:

Would you PLEASE try something for me? I'm one of "those" people......you know, the kind that tend to always see something that's either not there or just weird. Here's my suggestion. Crop just below the last visible cloud and turn this into a semi-pano type shot. Then, amp your saturation a little bit and then lastly bump your contrast a tad as well. I have a feeling this part of your image would simply sing with these adjustments. (Hint - I tried it and it makes a FANTASTIC water color - surreal - dreamlike pano wall art!)


eeeewwwww, eeewwwwww, eewwwww can I post it.....can I....puuuhhhlllleeeeaaase ?????

Oh lord, I hope I don't have to go to the punishment corner for this. I'll take it down ASAP if told to do so!

Simply what I "saw" in your already wonderful image.
...

That is pretty. I'll give it a try later, but probably won't crop it. Thanks for pointing that out.

wfeller

Dave Clee wrote:

Hmmm, unfortunately this particular shot doesnt do alot for me. I have looked at it a couple of times now and each time I come away with a puzzled feeling of why this would of made the keeper list

Cheers

Dave

Because I liked it.

Dave Clee

Well they do say beauty is in the eye of the holder...this definitely backs up that theory..

Cheers

Dave

wfeller

Dave Clee wrote:

Well they do say beauty is in the eye of the holder...this definitely backs up that theory..

Cheers

Dave

I'll say, I've seen your work, and I definately don't understand certain subjects you've found attractive. But, it's all subjective and as you say, in the eye of the beholder. Good luck to you and best regards!

wfeller

Idlewild wrote:

...

Simply what I "saw" in your already wonderful image.

Thanks again. I just couldn't get out of it what you did, but it was fun anyhow.

Darren Troy C

Dave Clee wrote:

Well they do say beauty is in the eye of the holder...this definitely backs up that theory..

Cheers

Dave

You have a great eye.....no doubt. However, your tact is what could use some tuning.

Dave Clee

Trust me my "tact" is just fine. But the internet does make things sound harsher than they really are..In the end it was just shot that puzzled me as to what was interesting enough to Mr Wfeller that caused him to keep it.
Simple as that really.


Cheers

Dave

Idlewild wrote:

You have a great eye.....no doubt. However, your tact is what could use some tuning.