#10 - the sequel
divamum
Registered Users Posts: 9,021 Major grins
Well, not exactly the sequel to yesterday's attempt since it's a completely different idea (and I thought of this one first).
I like the idea, but the execution is proving really really tough, not least because it's so hard to make out the details - I need a bigger hourglass (and haven't - yet - been able to find one...). This is definitely stretching my pp skills (I figured after NO pp last time, why not? ) I wish I could make the text of the name clearer, but nothing I've tried has quite worked (edited to add: see image in subsequent post - marginal improvement)
Thoughts?
I like the idea, but the execution is proving really really tough, not least because it's so hard to make out the details - I need a bigger hourglass (and haven't - yet - been able to find one...). This is definitely stretching my pp skills (I figured after NO pp last time, why not? ) I wish I could make the text of the name clearer, but nothing I've tried has quite worked (edited to add: see image in subsequent post - marginal improvement)
Thoughts?
facebook | photo site |
0
Comments
Neat idea for sure.
http://precisephoto.ca
Scrabble, actually
I was just trying to sneak back to replace the one above with the next version before anybody replied, but you beat me to it!! lol. I'm not sure this solves the problems you mention (with which I agree), but at least the text is slightly more legible... (I can see tomorrow is going to be my quest for an hourglass. Do dollar stores carry them??!?!?!?! :giggle
http://precisephoto.ca
It is never to late to become what you might have been.
www.behindthezoom.com
Whadda we think?
(edited to add: I went ahead and entered yet another version is for the time being, but please keep the comments coming, and THANKS for all the feedback!! My eyes are now bugging out so it is time to STOP for a day or two!!)
http://precisephoto.ca
Despite WAY too much time on my part (I mean, come on ps - you can't make a turn-cheap-plastic-into-antique-sparkling-glass action?!) - it shares the problem (if in different ways). I wish I could find a better prop, but at this point I'm stuck with this one (and this week is frantically busy so I'm not expecting to have extra time to shoot again). Anyway, here's the current entry:
I intentionally centered it - not sure if this is a case where "breaking the rule" works or not, but it seemed to warrant it. As always, C&C welcomed!
The lighting in this one is really nice. The red version is OK. But this particular one stands out for me.
http://lrichters.smugmug.com
Thanks Linda. I'm still not 100% happy with either if I'm honest (and a trip to the dollar store today yielded yet another idea to footle around with)... I'm just short on TIME this week and don't know if I'll get to do what I want with them. I'm so new to really using PS that everything takes me forever as there's a huge element of trial and error involved (even with a good reference book). We'll see (hmm... that laundry doesn't REALLY need doing does it? And we could eat on paper plates this week and that'll gain me an extra half hour to spend with Photoshop.... Yes, j/k! (mostly)
Thanks!
Current entry:
Positively Final Absolutely Last Attempt (yeah, right :giggle)
Put me out of my misery!!
(Edited to add: the really sad thing is that I've had yet another - and rather more human - idea for this one, but I don't think I"ll get a chance to shoot it. Oh well - next time!)
Peace,
Donna
Another idea you could think about (like you aren't busy enough) is having the tombstone on the bottom. The falling sand could then coalesce into the tombstone, becoming a visual analogy of the accumulation of time leading to the inevitable end.
I did, however, get lucky last night in that we had a (nearly) full moon and it was clear. I've changed the entry yet again... I'm not sure if I actually *like* it, but even if it's rubbish I can consider it the best tutorial in photoshop effects EVER - my word but I know more about it now than when I started a few days ago....
(That said: can anybdoy tell me why when I have a layer that I use with a mask - eg to add an effect - it will work great, UNTIL I go work on another layer. If I then come back to the first one, the brushes will act as black and white instead of add/subtract, and I can't for the LIFE of me figure out why! All answers gratefully received....)
In any case, BIG THANKS to everybody who's chimed in on this. It's been fun!
http://lrichters.smugmug.com
When you go back to the layer with the mask, make sure that you click on the right-hand window for that layer.
The left is what ever is on that layer. The right is the mask itself. Good luck! Feel free to PM me if you need to.
— Kevin
My Site, My Book
:ivarTHANK YOU!
Ok, I had no clue that you had to "reactivate" the mask, as it were - I was just clicking on the layer without even noticing if the mask was higlighted, so that MUST be what it is! Wow, I wish I'd had the sense to post this question 2 hrs ago... it would have saved me a lot of deleting and re-doing from scratch!!
Thanks! I'm still not sure I actually *like* the image I've produced, but it's the best I could do given the means I have available to me (no pretty hourglass, no macro lens, no studio lights etc etc etc!). And it was VERY cool to photograph the moon last night (and big props to dgrin on that, too, since I remembered seeing a technique thread about it commenting on how tricky it was so I just went and looked up the advice there before spending hours figuring it out on my own! So easy when you know how.... )