IU Soul Revue
So, I had to go photograph something for the yearbook, and my editor told me he needs to see more creativity in the book. So he told me to be creative, and I said "OK, but I go extreme abstract." He said ok.
They needed to fill space for today's paper, so I told them I had some photos for this, and they went through them. The designer said they were amazing and he wished he could do more things like this (they used the first 5 photos for a mini photo page. It looked awesome).
I think I got a little lucky. The bar probably thought lighting techniques stopped with Eddison. 3200iso. Breaking the focal length/shutter speed inverse relation, and then some (my 135 was struggling although I accidentally bumped it to f2.5 somehow). And they weren't just standing around, they were fairly active. Although that, and I still had to up the exposure in photoshop, although I think the grain adds some atmosphere to the photos. Maybe I should try them in Black and white.
And just a few extras I liked also
They needed to fill space for today's paper, so I told them I had some photos for this, and they went through them. The designer said they were amazing and he wished he could do more things like this (they used the first 5 photos for a mini photo page. It looked awesome).
I think I got a little lucky. The bar probably thought lighting techniques stopped with Eddison. 3200iso. Breaking the focal length/shutter speed inverse relation, and then some (my 135 was struggling although I accidentally bumped it to f2.5 somehow). And they weren't just standing around, they were fairly active. Although that, and I still had to up the exposure in photoshop, although I think the grain adds some atmosphere to the photos. Maybe I should try them in Black and white.
And just a few extras I liked also
Audentes fortuna iuvat
0
Comments
Moving away from photography and into cinema. PM me if you have questions about DSLR workflow or production questions.
Film Reel: http://vimeo.com/19955876
You think those are noisy? You should have seen the originals These are with Raw editor AND PS noise reduction.
http://pyryekholm.kuvat.fi/
Indoors, hmmm, wouldn't the 50mm f1.4 work better in this situation on a 40D?
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Yeah it would, except that wide shot wasn't shot at 50mm, and there was no room to maneuver to get the shot like that.
And yes I absolutely love that 135 I would marry it if it was legal to do so
Wow!
I love the low light shooting
Soooooo much mood! Sleek!
Oh, I already knew you had done that. trust me I venture into the no-flash ISO 3200 area often in my venues.... I hate it but it's a necessary evil.. Here's a tip though, noise reduction in CS4 is far better.
Moving away from photography and into cinema. PM me if you have questions about DSLR workflow or production questions.
Film Reel: http://vimeo.com/19955876
__________________
www.browngreensports.com
http://browngreensports.smugmug.com
It won't replace Noiseware, but when used WITH noiseware you can kill a lot of the noise without making the image soft.
The ACR 5.1 noise reduction is what I'm talking about.. not the filter in PS..
Moving away from photography and into cinema. PM me if you have questions about DSLR workflow or production questions.
Film Reel: http://vimeo.com/19955876
As a musician, and having photographed a lot of them, I absolutely love your cropping...not too close for my taste. The thing about them is you've captured the essence of the instrument...that key point of focus for each of them, without needing to show more...I think it's terrific. The lighting (or lack of it) captures it that nightclub ambience and makes it feel real. Wouldn't change it at all.
We all seem to like the trumpet as one of the top and I think that's because you didn't choose to show the embouchure - which is the usual focus for trumpet players (ever since all the Dizzy shots!). I like your choice!
These resonated with me...no pun intended...alright, pun intended.
- Gary.