Google description

waynedsargentwaynedsargent Registered Users Posts: 100 Big grins
edited December 9, 2008 in SmugMug Support
I cant seem to get my google description to show up. I add text in the bio box like the wiki barb has says to but to no avail any ideas?:dunno

Comments

  • denisegoldbergdenisegoldberg Administrators Posts: 14,409 moderator
    edited December 8, 2008
    I cant seem to get my google description to show up. I add text in the bio box like the wiki barb has says to but to no avail any ideas?
    How long have you waited? It can take days (weeks?) for google to pick up and show the change.

    Can you post your site address here so we can at least verify that the page looks good? I'd recommend adding it to your signature so that it is always available to the helpers here. Click You! above and to the left, then Edit Signature.

    --- Denise
  • waynedsargentwaynedsargent Registered Users Posts: 100 Big grins
    edited December 8, 2008
    oh
    I didnt know it would take such a long time to update.eek7.gif Can I put meta tags in there for better SE results as well?

    www.sargentphotgraphy.org
  • denisegoldbergdenisegoldberg Administrators Posts: 14,409 moderator
    edited December 8, 2008
    I didnt know it would take such a long time to update.eek7.gif Can I put meta tags in there for better SE results as well?

    www.sargentphotgraphy.org
    The web adress you posted doesn't work. Can you check the url?

    No, you can't use meta tags. I'd recommend following the recommendations in this wiki post - http://wiki.smugmug.net/display/SmugMug/Maximize+Search+Engine+Findability.

    --- Denise
  • waynedsargentwaynedsargent Registered Users Posts: 100 Big grins
    edited December 8, 2008
    doh!!
    help if i could spell photography...........eek7.gifhuheek7.gifhuh

    www.sargentphotography.org
  • Erick LErick L Registered Users Posts: 355 Major grins
    edited December 8, 2008
    How long have you waited? It can take days (weeks?) for google to pick up and show the change.

    It's been over a year here and I still get the Smugmug description. Searching for photo sharing in google.ca, my site shows up before Smugmug.
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited December 8, 2008
    Erick L wrote:
    It's been over a year here and I still get the Smugmug description. Searching for photo sharing in google.ca, my site shows up before Smugmug.
    Erick -I've suggested till I'm blue in the face, that you follow my search tips, you haven't yet.

    http://wiki.smugmug.net/display/SmugMug/Maximize+Search+Engine+Findability

    put the google food in your bio box. It works.
  • Erick LErick L Registered Users Posts: 355 Major grins
    edited December 8, 2008
    What are you talking about? I have text in my bio. Google should pick that up but it doesn't.
  • denisegoldbergdenisegoldberg Administrators Posts: 14,409 moderator
    edited December 8, 2008
    help if i could spell photography...........eek7.gifhuheek7.gifhuh

    www.sargentphotography.org
    I just did a view source on your home page and this is what I saw:
    ADD A FEW LINES OF TEXT HERE. REMEMBER, WHATEVER YOU ADD HERE WILL PARTLY SHOW IN THE SEARCH RESULTS.
    var oParams = new Object;
    I doubt that's what you want to see in the search engine results. I'd recommend adding the test that you really want at the beginning of your bio box in a div that is set to hidden.

    If you want to see an example, do a view source on my home page (link below), or a view source on Andy's www.moonriverphotography.com.

    --- Denise
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited December 8, 2008
    Erick L wrote:
    What are you talking about? I have text in my bio. Google should pick that up but it doesn't.
    Hi Erick, please read my link - it's very, very clearly written and if you do what I've posted, Google will get some nice food.
    How about right now?
  • Erick LErick L Registered Users Posts: 355 Major grins
    edited December 8, 2008
    It just says to put descriptive information in the bio box. There is text in my bio and although it isn't a pretty description, Google should pick that up, just like it picks up the slideshow code for those who only have that in their bio. Actually, the description showing up in Google is the one I had on my old site. It's the part in blue that now says "Smugmug - blablabla" instead of "borealphoto.com".

    But I don't care that much about the description on my homepage. I was just mentionning the problem. "Photo Sharing" brings the most traffic to my homepage and today, I added a link with referer link. I might as well profit from the situation.

    What bothers me is the gallery descriptions but it isn't the topic here. You'll tell me to put my own description but I don't need one, Google doesn't need one (it uses the page content if there's none) and I don't want to add and hide a description just to take SM description away. I find that a bit sneaky on SM part.

    I do question the wiki page. I had keywords in a gallery and couldn't find any of these images in Google. I removed them and a week later, my photos started popping up in the search results. On some occasions for a park, my gallery did better than the official site. I've come to the conclusion that keywords actually hurt more than they help.

    Sorry Andy but since someone here told me that title tags were "not life changing" while everybody knows it's the single most important tag, including the article linked in the wiki page (10 things SEO don't want you to know), I've lost faith in SM advices.
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited December 8, 2008
    Erick L wrote:
    I've lost faith in SM advices.
    OK if you won't let me help you then I really can't help you :( I'm really, really sorry Erick.
  • waynedsargentwaynedsargent Registered Users Posts: 100 Big grins
    edited December 8, 2008
    gonna take my thread back
    Andy how long does it usually take google to catch up to the meta tags in the bio box?

    and do they need to be visible or can they remain hidden on the home page.
  • Erick LErick L Registered Users Posts: 355 Major grins
    edited December 8, 2008
    Tell me what's wrong with my bio. There is text in it and Google doesn't pick it up. Also, i'd like to know why SM imposes its own gallery description.

    You told me to read the wiki page. I did. I also followed some advices and it didn't work. As far as I can tell, it actually hurt. I've had a site since 2001 before SM and did fine in Google. I'm still doing fine. My galleries and images are found but the way they are presented in the search results could be better. Maybe I have a point, no? The wiki page is not the end of all things SEO. It might work for you but remember that your site is constantly referenced here and you have a high PR for a personnal photo website.

    Just a little exemple... Look at the Dgrin title tag in the browser, it's says:

    Google Description - Digital Grin Photography Forum

    It doesn't say:

    Digital Grin Photography Forum - Google Description

    There is a reason why vbulletin arranges the title tag like this. It's better for SE and people are more likely to click if what they're looking for is at the beginning of the sentence. In Smugmug, every single title starts with the site name and the gallery or photo caption follows. It should be the other way around. So if someone searches for moose, it should say:

    Moose - Borealphoto's Photos - Powered by Smugmug

    (I'd prefer Borealphoto.com but I can live with that)

    instead of:

    Borealphoto's Photos - Moose - Powered by Smugmug

    Besides, it's Borealphoto that's powered by Smugmug, not the moose.rolleyes1.gif
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited December 8, 2008
    Erick L wrote:
    Tell me what's wrong with my bio. There is text in it and Google doesn't pick it up. Also, i'd like to know why SM imposes its own gallery description.

    You told me to read the wiki page. I did. I also followed some advices and it didn't work. As far as I can tell, it actually hurt. I've had a site since 2001 before SM and did fine in Google. I'm still doing fine. My galleries and images are found but the way they are presented in the search results could be better. Maybe I have a point, no? The wiki page is not the end of all things SEO. It might work for you but remember that your site is constantly referenced here and you have a high PR for a personnal photo website.

    Just a little exemple... Look at the Dgrin title tag in the browser, it's says:

    Google Description - Digital Grin Photography Forum

    It doesn't say:

    Digital Grin Photography Forum - Google Description

    There is a reason why vbulletin arranges the title tag like this. It's better for SE and people are more likely to click if what they're looking for is at the beginning of the sentence. In Smugmug, every single title starts with the site name and the gallery or photo caption follows. It should be the other way around. So if someone searches for moose, it should say:

    Moose - Borealphoto's Photos - Powered by Smugmug

    (I'd prefer Borealphoto.com but I can live with that)

    instead of:

    Borealphoto's Photos - Moose - Powered by Smugmug

    Besides, it's Borealphoto that's powered by Smugmug, not the moose.<img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6029383/emoji/rolleyes1.gif&quot; border="0" alt="" >

    Hi Erick,

    I use this in my bio:

    BIO:

    <html>
    <div id="bioText">Moon River Photography by Andy Williams
    Portrait, event, and senior photography. Also specializing in Landscapes
    and Fine Art. New York City and Westchester County.
    </div>
    And when you view source, you see this:

    <meta name="description" content="Moon River Photography by Andy Williams
    Portrait, event, and senior photography. Also specializing in Landscapes and Fine Art. New York City and Westchester County.






    Your site shows this in the Source :)

    <meta name="description" content="Derniers ajouts -
    Mini-Jpegs (de l'ancien site)









    Lieux" />

    Because, that's what Google indexes first. My Wiki page instructs you to take some more control over it and do like I've done. It's rather simple, do it or not, it's really up to you :D

    Holler if I may help.
  • denisegoldbergdenisegoldberg Administrators Posts: 14,409 moderator
    edited December 8, 2008
    Andy how long does it usually take google to catch up to the meta tags in the bio box?

    and do they need to be visible or can they remain hidden on the home page.
    Did you miss my post here - http://www.dgrin.com/showpost.php?p=982585&postcount=9? When I do a view source on your home page I don't see a reasonable description. Instead it says "put a few lines of text here...". That's not because of Google - that's because the text in your bio box doesn't descrbe your site.

    The text that you add for search purposes does not need to be visible. Google doesn't care if it is visible on the screen; it is looking at the page source.

    --- Denise
  • Erick LErick L Registered Users Posts: 355 Major grins
    edited December 8, 2008
    Andy wrote:
    Your site shows this in the Source :)

    <meta name="description" content="Derniers ajouts -
    Mini-Jpegs (de l'ancien site)
    I know that. It's been like for a year, but it still doesn't doesn't show in the Google description. If I search for borealphoto, this is what I see:

    SmugMug Photo Sharing. Your photos look better here.

    Faune, flore et paysages du Québec et du Canada. Articles et nombreux liens.


    The description under Smugmug spam :D is the one I had before I moved to Smugmug. My point is that the text in my bio is not picked up at all, not wether it's descriptive or not. Why am I still stuck with Smugmug spam as page title?
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited December 8, 2008
    Erick L wrote:
    Why am I still stuck with Smugmug spam as page title?
    I can't change that. Yet.

    Why won't you listen to me on the other stuff? Sorry :(
  • Erick LErick L Registered Users Posts: 355 Major grins
    edited December 8, 2008
    The text that you add for search purposes does not need to be visible. Google doesn't care if it is visible on the screen; it is looking at the page source

    Directly from Google (under "avoid hidden text"):
    Hiding text or links in your content can cause your site to be perceived as untrustworthy since it presents information to search engines differently than to visitors. Text (such as excessive keywords) can be hidden in several ways, including:
    • Using white text on a white background
    • Including text behind an image
    • Using CSS to hide text
    • Setting the font size to 0
  • Erick LErick L Registered Users Posts: 355 Major grins
    edited December 8, 2008
    Andy wrote:
    Why won't you listen to me on the other stuff? Sorry :(

    What other stuff?
  • carolinecaroline Registered Users Posts: 1,302 Major grins
    edited December 9, 2008
    Hi Erick,
    I've followed every tip that is in the Wiki and anything else I can pick up here, I've no technical knowledge other than what I have learned here.
    You say that your bio text isn't picked up at all - If you do what Andy et al here are suggesting then googling your site name can look more like mine does:-
    Search ResultsCaroline Shipsey Photography - Images of Landscape & Life- powered ...Caroline Shipsey Photography,Caroline Shipsey Photographer, Mendip Hills, landscapes,countryside,all aspects of rural life, prints, digital downloads, ...

    Also, changing the bio text has done more to improve results for my site when using using terms like 'mendip photographs' etc than anything else. I have struggled to get anywhere on the first page of results when using the term 'mendip' + photography/er/s etc but this has worked for me. It was picked up by google in less than 24 hours. Just give it a try, it must take you more time here arguing the point than it would to make the changes :D

    I don't get huge numbers of hits to my site neither do I sell through SmugMug, I'm in a rural area in the UK and just want the local people to find me when they want to - it works, I was at an event on Saturday someone came up to me and commissioned a photograph - Lovely, made my day.

    Caroline
    Erick L wrote:
    I know that. It's been like for a year, but it still doesn't doesn't show in the Google description. If I search for borealphoto, this is what I see:

    SmugMug Photo Sharing. Your photos look better here.

    Faune, flore et paysages du Québec et du Canada. Articles et nombreux liens.


    The description under Smugmug spam :D is the one I had before I moved to Smugmug. My point is that the text in my bio is not picked up at all, not wether it's descriptive or not. Why am I still stuck with Smugmug spam as page title?
    Mendip Blog - Blog from The Fog, life on the Mendips
    www.carolineshipsey.co.uk - Follow me on G+

    [/URL]
  • Erick LErick L Registered Users Posts: 355 Major grins
    edited December 9, 2008
    I've said it a thousand times, I have no problems getting found at all and people finding my homepage is the least of my worry. I want people to find galleries and photographs. Being high-ranked in the SERP is one of the things about my site I've been most proud of. I do have some knowledge of SEO but for some reason, Andy keeps trying to help me when I'm actually trying to help them. I'm not the only one here who said Smugmug could be more search engine friendly.
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited December 9, 2008
    Erick L wrote:
    I'm not the only one here who said Smugmug could be more search engine friendly.
    Keywords are found by google.
    I get your site on page one of google, searching for yul trudeau dorval

    yeah, we have to fix the fact that it's showing as http://www.smugmug.com/gallery/3686722_yPZFo/1/427558316_3EdxJ#427558316_3EdxJ and not your nickname - that's a bug.
  • carolinecaroline Registered Users Posts: 1,302 Major grins
    edited December 9, 2008
    Hi Andy wave.gif
    Ref the bug mentioned, does that mean that the point I referred to in my thread http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=111071 is also a bug ?

    Caroline
    Andy wrote:
    Keywords are found by google.
    I get your site on page one of google, searching for yul trudeau dorval

    yeah, we have to fix the fact that it's showing as http://www.smugmug.com/gallery/3686722_yPZFo/1/427558316_3EdxJ#427558316_3EdxJ and not your nickname - that's a bug.
    Mendip Blog - Blog from The Fog, life on the Mendips
    www.carolineshipsey.co.uk - Follow me on G+

    [/URL]
  • Erick LErick L Registered Users Posts: 355 Major grins
    edited December 9, 2008
    Andy wrote:
    Keywords are found by google.
    I get your site on page one of google, searching for yul trudeau dorval

    yeah, we have to fix the fact that it's showing as http://www.smugmug.com/gallery/3686722_yPZFo/1/427558316_3EdxJ#427558316_3EdxJ and not your nickname - that's a bug.

    You found it because of the captions, not keywords. I uploaded this image quite recently (1-2 weeks) so as I said, I have no problem being found. When I uploaded images and added keywords (and captions), they didn't start showing up until I removed the keywords (but left the captions). Me thinks the keywords field isn't so great, unless you make them visible. Someboby else made the same observation on Dgrin.

    And that's a big bug! With keywords, I found my images with other members' images in a "keyword gallery" like smugmug.com/keyword. So my keywords brought traffic to Smugmug and other people's images instead of my site. You can see why I don't like I'm not crazy about adding them.

    There are three things that bugs me:

    - The obsession over keywords. I find captions MUCH more important. Captions are used as alt tags, which is good. Instead of saying "keywords keywords keywords" on the wiki, it should say "captions captions captions and captions again".
    - The lack of proper title tags.
    - Smugmug forcing a gallery description on us. Meta descriptions (and meta keywords) aren't that important. If there's none, Google uses the page content, which would be the captions for most photo sites. I choose not use one because it adds clutter. The problem is the only way to have none is to add one and hide it, otherwise SM puts is own (ultimate photo sharing...). It add extra work for no reason and search engines don't like hidden text. This is just spam on SM part and it's unacceptable. We already have the "powered by Smugmug" in the footer and title tag. And to think that SM told me title tags aren't important...
Sign In or Register to comment.